[SpamCop-List] Re: Is there a valid reason?
Paul Johnson
baloo at ursine.ca
Thu Jul 22 02:27:13 EDT 2004
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hoyt Weathers <ahab at hiwaay.net> writes:
> Why can't SpamCop operate as well as SpamPal? Is it a technical or
> legal or another reason? I would love to run SpamPal, but I am running
> a Mac and SP is only for PCs it seems.
I thought SpamPal was some sort of MDA for Windows systems, not a
reporting service.
Either way, stop whining that you're a newbie and try to make some
sense.
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFA/3pkUzgNqloQMwcRAgWpAJ9uxV2H+KMn9SGFA+Y6/e6ztJJpgACgz69C
uu7LBNm5uHV+otV41c6s39E=
=UXra
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the SpamCop-List
mailing list