[SpamCop-List] Re: Mail Daemon Spam - what is it?
nobody at spamcop.net
Tue Mar 2 19:11:51 EST 2004
"Marjolein Katsma" <nobody at spamcop.net> wrote in message
news:Xns94A0F12FA6404homesitehelp at 18.104.22.168...
> Miss Betsy (nobody at spamcop.net) wrote in news:c2324p$tbr$1
> > The problem with the bounced spam is the same one as the one
> > viruses. Yes, they are unsolicited; yes, they are probably
> > they are unwanted by almost everyone. And they fit the
> > spam.
> No, that's not the problem we're talking about.
> We're talking about *real* spams, peddling pirated software, for
> instance; but with only *headers* deliberately made to look as if
> bounce. A reader of the mail would see an ad for cheap software -
> SpamCop sees a bounce and refuses parse (let alone report) it.
> Bounces from viruses are a problem; but those _are_ bounces and
> not what we're discussing in this and anotehr thread.
So they don't even look like bounces? except when spamcop parses
More information about the SpamCop-List