[SpamCop-List] Re: Jammed up headers
Bruce A. Johnson
Windrider6 at SpamCop.net
Fri Mar 19 04:21:55 EST 2004
"Mike Easter" <MikeE at ster.invalid> wrote in
news:c3ds75$aqi$1 at news.spamcop.net:
> Bruce A. Johnson wrote:
>> "Mike Easter"
>>> This item:
>>> shows a spam with deficient elements in the header so SC won't parse
>> I swear on my honor, those two are the same spam.
> Oh, I see. You're right. I'm wrong. In the first one I didn't look
> at what was extended beyond my screen view after the X-Message-Info
> line should have ended
>> This is a whole bunch of headers jammed together into one line, so
>> SpamCop doesn't "see" the headers that are "hidden" inside this long
> You are correct, sir! [As Ed McMahon sed]
>> All I did was edit this one long line was to add carriage returns to
>> what should have been the start of new lines (like Received, Date,
>> Message-Id, From, To, Content-Type, etc.). Then I resubmitted the
>> edited version to SpamCop in the second instance.
> I understand now.
Thank you. Now if I can only get this issue to the attention of the
- Bruce A. Johnson in Hardisty, Alberta, Canada
- Windrider6 at SpamCop.net
More information about the SpamCop-List