[SpamCop-List] Re: [MEDIA] Email marketer sues anti-spam group Spamcop

[Redstone]

"Bob W." <responseguard at hotmail.com> wrote in
news:responseguard-5666D6.00065304052004 at news.cesmail.net: 


> 
> I've always maintained that spam recipients are actually party to
> or an interested party in regard to the contracts and TOS covering
> any system or user that sends them spam, in the sense that if the
> anti-spam provisions of the TOS aren't enforced, then the service
> whose TOS is being violated is violating their own contract, and
> in a sense is committing a contractual offense against the spam
> victim. 
> 
> 

This is an interesting point. It appears that a number of these ISPs 
ignore their own TOSes all for the mighty dollar. 

Makes me think of the whining from Hopone's representative who is 
posting on NANAE about the SPEWS listing."Well, we couldn't shut him 
down.. we had $300 grand invested."