[SpamCop-List] Re: IronPort Bonded Sender list integration with Spamcop RBL?

[Turbofroggy]

What I was asking about isn't mixing them, just prefiltering the 
bl.spamcop.net canidates aginst the Bonded Sender of IronPort.
That way all you would have to do it one query using a standard RBL lookup 
to get a pre-screened list of known spammers without any false positives of 
people who are listed in the Bonded Sender list.
I would think that pre-filtering the bl.spamcop.net would make for a even 
more trustworthy list and reduce the amount of false positives.
For those purests who like false positives maybe a new zone called 
bl-ip.spamcop.net (or whatever) that is the filtered zone and retain the 
existing bl.spamcop.net.

"Pavel Roskin" <proski at nospam.spamcop.net> wrote in message 
news:409BBE39.2050208 at nospam.spamcop.net...
> Turbofroggy wrote:
>> Is the Spamcop RBL bl.spamcop.net checked aginst the IronPort Bonded 
>> Sender list?
>> It seems only logical since you guys are the same company now, and you 
>> wouldn't want to be listing whitelisted IronPort people in the Spamcop 
>> RBL... :)
>
> It would be better to have the Bonded Sender whitelist in the list of 
> available blacklists for Spamcop mail subscribers.  Those selecting it 
> would have the matching messages whitelisted.
>
> Mixing Bonded Sender with bl.spamcop.net would negatively affect 
> credibility of the Spamcop blacklist.  It should be the user's choice 
> which black- and whitelists to honor, also to those who use DNS based 
> lists.
>
> -- 
> Regards,
> Pavel Roskin