[SpamCop-List] Re: Bonded Spammer vs SpamCop, what will happen?

[Tim McGraw]

Blammo wrote:
> On 18 May 2004 Tim McGraw entered spamcop and left 
> news:40A9C76A.7020505 at spamcop.net:
> 
>>fredfighter at spamcop.net wrote:
>>
>>>Will SpamCop depart from the internet standard defintion of
>>>spam?
>>
>>What "standard defintion"?
> 
> Perhaps confusing UCE/ UBE with the term "spam"?
> The literal definition of "spam" (based on the term's origin) is: large 
> quantities of messages forced on you, despite your insistence that you 
> don't want them.

There is no definition of spam that everyone agrees on, and that was my 
point. Google on 'spamcop' "definition of spam" and throw in 'wayne' for 
good measure ;)