[SpamCop-List] Re: Bonded Spammer vs SpamCop, what will happen?
tmcgraw at spamcop.net
Tue May 18 10:09:17 EDT 2004
> On 18 May 2004 Tim McGraw entered spamcop and left
> news:40A9C76A.7020505 at spamcop.net:
>>fredfighter at spamcop.net wrote:
>>>Will SpamCop depart from the internet standard defintion of
>>What "standard defintion"?
> Perhaps confusing UCE/ UBE with the term "spam"?
> The literal definition of "spam" (based on the term's origin) is: large
> quantities of messages forced on you, despite your insistence that you
> don't want them.
There is no definition of spam that everyone agrees on, and that was my
point. Google on 'spamcop' "definition of spam" and throw in 'wayne' for
good measure ;)
More information about the SpamCop-List