[SpamCop-List] Re: I'm leaving spamcop....
Michael Lefevre
michael.spamcop at michaellefevre.com
Fri May 28 19:41:27 EDT 2004
Paul Johnson wrote:
> Michael Lefevre <michael.spamcop at michaellefevre.com> writes:
[snip]
>> How about:
>>
>> I'd like a coffee with one sugar, but no cream.
>> : Would you like a coffee?
>>
>> The first line makes sense without the question.
>
> But bones the third person out of a place to continue.
Only if the third person isn't also top-posting.
[snip]
> And so forth until it gets entirely unreadable and out of context as
> other people try to reply around it. Don't be so egotistical as to
> think that the conversation always stops with your reply.
I don't. I post however fits in with the forum/newsgroup/email
correspondence that I'm participating in. My point is only that "don't top
post because it's backwards" is not a good argument - it fails to
communicate what's wrong with top posting or that the "right" way isn't
full quoting and posting underneath.
--
Michael
More information about the SpamCop-List
mailing list