[SpamCop-List] Re: SC not getting dates right - again
nobody at xyzzy.claranet.de
Sat Nov 27 02:38:49 EST 2004
Mike Easter wrote:
> We know the deputy can manually untrust the server
I've seen that happening now for the first time, Ellen just
did it (too late for me, today the spam is really too old ;-)
I'm a fan of solutions working as far as possible without
manual interventions, so I still think that picking Jumpy's
timestamp was a dubious idea at least for "mailhosts" users.
Okay, let's replace Jumpy by Snowwwhite (e.g. W3C), my idea
has a minor flaw, it could be the 1st MTA on "my" side which
caused the delay (maybe it was down).
OTOH it's only a timestamp, it helps to identify stale spam.
The slightly more aggressive approach of using my timestamp
won't cause havoc, after all it's still spam.
More information about the SpamCop-List