[SpamCop-List] Re: IMHO SpamCop are utterly IRRESPONSIBLE

[Socks the white house cat]

Someday in the distant future, archeologists digging thru the ruins of
spamcop  will discover that "Bryan" <gruvin_nz at hotmail.com> had this to
say on 01 Sep 2004: 

[rest of the BS snipped]

> I smell a class action law suite in the wind!
> 

that isn't a "law suite" you smell. You're downwind of yourself.

> This issue is set to explode in your face. You are likely to be facing
> class action law suites some time very soon if you don't fix this
> nonsense! 
> 

hee hee.  http://lawsuite.word-to-the-wise.com/

If Richter couldn't beat them, and Waggoner couldn't beat them, do you 
really think someone as illiterate as you has a chance?

> 
> 
> I have carefully recorded evidence and have three separate witnesses
> that this is EXACTLY what SpamCop have done. You can NOT convince us
> otherwise, and you sure wont convince a judge.
> 

1) Judge already ruled. Spamcop is protected by CDA
2) So am I. 47 USC 230 "otherwise objectionable" and all that
3) people who threaten "law suites" are "otherwise objectionable"
4) I just blocked maxnet.co.nz on my servers. Sue me too.
5) "law suites" - you wouldn't happen to know someone named 
   Ron Ritzman,do you? Only people trying to do parodies 
   poking fun at stupid spammers use that misspelling. I 
   don't really think that you're an illiterate moron - you
   are just trying to play one on the Internet for entertainment
   purposes.  "Law suite" is just too obvious though.


-- 
     I AM SPEWS (SLAPP PREVENTION ELECTRONIC WHITENOISE SYSTEM)
"Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never 
stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and 
neither do we."
George W. Bush 8/5/04