[SpamCop.net - protecting the internet through technology]

[SpamCop-List] Re: Att: Paul Johnson: PGP signature in spam

Glenn Daniels nobody at devnull.spamcop.net
Sun Sep 19 11:24:38 EDT 2004


"Porpoise"  wrote in message
> "Mike Easter" wrote in message
> <SNIP>
> > Actually my remarks were about Paul's 'disagreeable' ad hominem
> > disagreement or arguing style rather than beefing about the signature
> > issue, which I've weighed in on previously.
> >
> >
> > But, since you bring up the signed cleartext argument...
> >
> > My previous argument about the signed cleartext is that it has a place
> > and a distinct utility -- but that place and utility isn't /here/ for
> > several different reasons, not the least of which is that Ellen will
kill
> > [in a virtual sense] anyone who spoofs here, and also most likely that
> > absolutely no one here, with the exception of Paul, has or uses his key.
> > So what is the point of cluttering up the ng?
>
> That was my point exactly!
>

Errmmph. Sorry, Porpoise. Thanks for "cleaning up" my bad. {:-(
The devil in me made me do it. I am sorry for what I said, and sorry
about the bad quote. I will see it that it does not happen again. I
will find some way to work a penance.

And I do agree with you.




More information about the SpamCop-List mailing list