[SpamCop-List] Re: Sometimes Manual LARTs Work Fine
nobody at spamcop.net
Thu Apr 7 21:17:27 EDT 2005
in article mailman.129.1112890433.4572.spamcop-list at news.spamcop.net, Danny
Goodman at dannyg at dannyg.com wrote on 4/7/05 8:13 PM:
>> Consequently, we have taken
>> appropriate action against this account
> That phrase in LART responses always bothers me. It's sooo weasely. What's
> appropriate? To whom? Does that mean just a warning?
> If you canned his butt, why not say so?
and what about st0ck01-st0ck53, and 55-59?
All this might have accomplished is deletion of a few fsck -off messages
More information about the SpamCop-List