[SpamCop-List] Re: Head 'em off at the Headers

[rodxpam (fish)]

Hi again Mike;

     I may call you Mike, may I ?? Good.

     Mike, I skimmed through your second reply and, although I respect the
time and thought that went into *it*, I would have preferred, for selfish,
venal reasons, that you had devoted the time to reviewing my original post;
instead.  It would have saved you, me and anyone given to perusing these
posts a deal of time. In your responses, you raise questions, make
assumptions,  provide interpretations and make 'logical' extentions of your
assumptions .... and then proceed to defeat your own assumptions; which
production appears to give you personal gratification, perhaps even the
illusion of publicity, else why would you do it?... but it leaves this
seeker unsatisfied.

     I don't like to repeat myself, so I shan't.  But let's face it; Mike;
if you answered  exam questions with the same cavalier  indulgence ....  and
without answering the question ... you'd flunk. Am I wrong?

     Someone  willing to apply themselves to capturing the import of my
query and gracious enough to share an informed answer, is welcome to provide
it. Otherwise, please Mike, apply your insights where they can do the most
good; elsewhere.  If feeling chatty, the right person should get the job at
hand done in about 3 sentences, and maybe an URL or two.

I remain, yours,

rodxpam

boundary bay, b c