[SpamCop-List] Re: rsg

[Joris Van Damme]

> I don't wan to start a troll

Indeed, let's not go into this too deeply.

> but death penalty for spam is
> not fair (anyway I don't think he was murdered for this).

Of course. My personal opinion, I don't want to kill anyone. (That's as far
as my personal opinion goes. If I were to take it any further, along the
same line - which is not my responsability - then I'd say no reason is good
enough to kill anyone, including Bush-Christian values and re-election and
stuff. Murder is murder is murder, whether commited by a layman, a judge, or
a soldier. Worse still, last two are professionals.)

> This man didn't kill anybody and if the internet is ready to
> let anybody use freely helf of it's ressources, it deserve
> his problem.

True, in the sense that it is logically correct.

> nobody, even the worst man, is responsible to the weakness
> of some net responsibles.

Also true.

I would like to stress that I never dissagreed with any of this, and never
will.

However, the point raised is that a man is responsible for his abuse of
another man's weakness, which is quite different from being responsible for
the weaknesses themselves. Another point raised, is related to the fact that
I personally don't mind making jokes over the spammer's death, which is
quite different from killing him. I also stated that the world is a better
place without the sorts of criminals that likely get themselves killed by
fellow sorry asses. That too, is a statement I'm quite willing to repeat and
stick by. It's not the same as killing him, or defending death penalty or
whatever murdurous activity itself.

I don't think we dissagree, really. In any case, I don't dissagree with
anything you said here.


Joris