[SpamCop-List] Re: Why will not SC report http://uk.geocities.com/ ?

[Ant]

"Mike Easter" wrote:

> That step isn't the same as what we are talking about here about not
> providing an address from an unresolved url.  That item is showing
> resolution, address information, best contacts experience, and
> 'redirection' to a special address for the provider.

I'm well aware of that. I'm just showing the OP what should have
happened had the parser resolved the link...

>>  To: Internal spamcop handling: (yahoo) (Notes)
>
> Notes is clickable.

It leads to the comment boxes at the end of the report.

> Correct.  Yahoo wants their /spamcop/ notifies handled in their own way.
> If you are going to notify yahoo as an /individual/, SC will give you a
> different addy for 'non-spamcop' notifies.

...which as you point out, could be different for a manual lart. I
replied at this point in the thread because it was the last post the
OP made, and I thought it might be worth noting the difference.
Perhaps I should have clarified that, but it wasn't the main point of
my post. I would like to see this problem fixed - i.e. some sort of
message.

I've just reported a further two similar html geocities spams. In
quick succession. The first resolved the link, and the second saw the
link but did nothing. On revisiting the first tracker, the parser
decided it wouldn't resolve it this time.