[SpamCop-List] Re: [media] comic strip

[Larry Kilgallen]

In article <v2f263-rri.ln1 at ursine.ca>, baloo at ursine.ca writes:
> Larry Kilgallen <Kilgallen at spamcop.net> wrote:
>> In article <nk1263-lj7.ln1 at ursine.ca>, baloo at ursine.ca writes:
>>> Larry Kilgallen <Kilgallen at spamcop.net> wrote:
>>>> Questioning to a local editor the technical accuracy of one of the few
>>>> strips that does deal with spam is a bad move.
>>> 
>>> This comment just brings more questions.  Explain.
>> 
>> You can cause the strip to get cancelled from the local paper as
>> "too complicated".
> 
> So?  No skin off my teeth...

Whereas I believe that it is better to have the subject of spam come up
frequently in the popular literature.  Consider the Chicago quote "It
does not matter what they say about you in the papers, just so they
get your name right."

Nobody believes popular literature completely anyway, and inaccuracy
leading to discussion may be better than accuracy leading to lack of
discussion.