[SpamCop-List]
Re: I am getting more messages from this .pk server about
listserver messages I can do nothing about.
Geoffrey Hyde
g.hyde at bigpond.net.au
Sat Dec 10 17:34:12 EST 2005
It is spam because it fulfils the following conditions:
1. It is private listserver email intended for the original recipient who
sent a mailing list setup to it. Not me. Because of some non-compliant
header botchup that places me in the From: field. Therefore, spam.
2. Whoever or whatever sent the email that triggered this caused the server
to spam me, because I have an apparently valid From: in there, instead of
the address of the list server. See point #1 above. This to me means it is
spamming me.
3. It's also breaking rules in that it shouldn't be sending me
failure-notice messages, only to itself or to a null: email address and the
original sender. The reason it's spamming me with this totally useless
information is because my From: address is in there, despite the Reply-To
being munged.
Below is the full message source that was received. It apparently fills me
in as the From: recipient, which I understand is very bad practice if you
are running a mailing list server. The only place mailing list failures
should go is to the mailing list server that originally sent it out, which,
incidentally, hasn't done it's job very well, either, having not put itself
in as the From: recipient.
It's also spam because for a very long time the LugNet admins have been
supposed to take care of this problem, however, they apparently haven't
fixed it yet. Longer than two years is in my book an awfully long time to
fix a listserver problem.
Cheers ...
Geoffrey Hyde
Return-Path: <>
Received: from highway.nu.edu.pk ([202.83.174.53])
by imta06sl.mx.bigpond.com with ESMTP
id
<20051208035327.HXSM112.imta06sl.mx.bigpond.com at highway.nu.edu.pk>
for <g.hyde at bigpond.net.au>; Thu, 8 Dec 2005 03:53:27 +0000
Received: by ntc.net.pk with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2656.59)
id <YBAH0F9F>; Thu, 8 Dec 2005 08:49:49 +0500
Message-ID: <3B848F4FAFB98A43A09D301DAA62A778057925C6 at ntc.net.pk>
From: System Administrator <postmaster at nu.edu.pk>
To: g.hyde at bigpond.net.au
Subject: Undeliverable: Re: New contest
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 08:49:48 +0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2656.59)
X-MS-Embedded-Report:
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="----_=_NextPart_000_01C5FBAA.6FA6F781"
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.
------_=_NextPart_000_01C5FBAA.6FA6F781
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Your message
To: lugnet.robotics at lugnet.com
Subject: Re: New contest
Sent: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 05:33:30 +0500
did not reach the following recipient(s):
664 at NU.EDU.PK on Thu, 8 Dec 2005 08:49:45 +0500
The recipient name is not recognized
The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=us;a=
;p=fast;l=HIGHWAY0512080349YBAH0F7L
MSEXCH:IMS:FAST:lhr:HIGHWAY 0 (000C05A6) Unknown Recipient
------_=_NextPart_000_01C5FBAA.6FA6F781
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Message-ID: <Ir5M7y.17rq at lugnet.com>
From: Geoffrey Hyde <g.hyde at bigpond.net.au>
Sender: news-gateway at lugnet.com
Reply-To: Geoffrey Hyde <gDOThyde at bigpondDOTnetDOTau.pair.com>
To: lugnet.robotics at lugnet.com
Subject: Re: New contest
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 05:33:30 +0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2656.59)
X-MS-Embedded-Report:
X-Loop: lugnet.robotics at lugnet.com
X-MDRemoteIP: 65.163.27.210
X-Return-Path: g.hyde at bigpond.net.au
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11)
X-Spam-Report:
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=ham
version=2.64
X-Spam-Processed: mydomain.local, Thu, 08 Dec 2005 08:46:48 +0500
X-MDAV-Processed: mydomain.local, Thu, 08 Dec 2005 08:46:48 +0500
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: 664 at nu.edu.pk
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
"Robert Blair" <nobody at nowhere.not> wrote in message
news:TECQXhvKj0FX-pn2-NCeTjTkPqlkW at dsl-206-55-144-107.tstonramp.com...
> On Sat, 10 Dec 2005 05:21:27 UTC, "Geoffrey Hyde"
> <g.hyde at bigpond.net.au> wrote:
>
>> I could say that I've demonstrably argued that it is spam I'm dealing
>> with,
>> and that I'm trying to end my demonstration of what is spam about it,
>> with
>> you.
>
> It is not spam from my point of view. Unwanted yes, spam no.
>
>
> --
> Robert Blair
More information about the SpamCop-List
mailing list