[SpamCop-List] Re: Spamcop Statistics
Dorian Gray
D.Gray at picture.oscar.wilde
Wed Feb 2 15:52:37 EST 2005
In article <D.Gray-7D1430.15111402022005 at news.cesmail.net>,
Dorian Gray <D.Gray at picture.oscar.wilde> wrote:
> So, does anyone *else* know of any explanations, that they are willing
> to share? Alternatively, does anyone from Spamcop know the explanation,
> but can't share it, and are willing to say so?
P.S. Here (repeated) are the things about which we were after
explanation if possible:
"I also am interested in an explanation of aspects of the statistics.
I *think* the drop in the second half of September, and sustained lower
levels of submitted spam since then, correspond to the change in the
limit on the age of accepted spam from 3 to 2 days, which IIRC also went
with a recommendation that only spam less than 24 hours old was of any
real usefulness to Spamcop.
Can someone confirm this?
The spikes in late-Oct and January are intriguing. Being a Mac-only
user now, I'm not familiar with recent Windows virus/worm outbreaks,
which perhaps provide an explanation? If so, which ones correspond to
the spikes?
Also, can anyone explain why the spike in submitted spam in late-Oct
went with a corresponding spike in reports sent, while the spikes in
submitted spam in January did not?
Cheers."
More information about the SpamCop-List
mailing list