[SpamCop-List] Re: Why Am I Blocked? FAQ
Kenneth Brody
kenbrody at spamcop.net
Wed Feb 2 11:00:44 EST 2005
Michael Lefevre wrote:
>
> Miss Betsy wrote:
> > "Steven Maesslein" <nobody at nowhere.invalid> wrote in message
> > news:slrnd01d5d.mt.nobody at 127.0.0.1...
> >> On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 17:43:47 -0500, Miss Betsy coughed into
> > spamcop and
> >> left this in <ctp0gk$5kj$1 at news.spamcop.net>:
> >>
> >> > The SpmCopDNSbl listing will expire automatically within 48
> > hours
> >> > of the last report of spam from it.
> >>
> >> This isn't quite accurate as I understand it.
> >>
> > Technically, you are correct. The point of this FAQ is to go from
> > 'easy to understand' general statements (for most of the people who
> > come to find out why they are blocked) to the more specific
> > technical details.
>
> It should be possible to do that by leaving out detail - making things
> technically incorrect in the process of simplifying isn't good, because if
> people do go further than reading the FAQ and are then told something
> contradictory, it causes more problems than it solves.
Perhaps change:
The SpmCopDNSbl listing will expire automatically within 48 hours
of the last report of spam from it.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
to:
The SpmCopDNSbl listing will expire automatically within 48 hours
of the last reported spam from it.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> And, if you're making edits anyway, "SpmCopDNSbl" is wrong. Aside from
> missing the "a" from SpamCop, it's generally called the SpamCop BL - given
> that the audience for the document are unlikely to know what a DNSBL is,
> there's no point in adding extra letters...
--
+-------------------------+--------------------+-----------------------------+
| Kenneth J. Brody | www.hvcomputer.com | |
| kenbrody/at\spamcop.net | www.fptech.com | #include <std_disclaimer.h> |
+-------------------------+--------------------+-----------------------------+
Don't e-mail me at: <mailto:ThisIsASpamTrap at gmail.com>
More information about the SpamCop-List
mailing list