[SpamCop-List] Re: Spamcop Statistics
Dorian Gray
D.Gray at picture.oscar.wilde
Wed Feb 2 18:59:20 EST 2005
In article <ctr2e5$oqi$3 at news.spamcop.net>,
"Ellen" <nobody at spamcop.net> wrote:
> There are various reasons why you may see anomolies in the stat graphs. I
> cannot go into detail about them.
Thanks Ellen. By anomalies, do you mean the spikes? Okay, so they'll
remain a mystery. But can you go into detail about the consistently
lower level of submitted spam since September? Can you say whether or
not it simply corresponds to the change in the limit on the age of
accepted spam from 3 to 2 days, which IIRC also went with a
recommendation that only spam less than 24 hours old was of any real
usefulness to Spamcop?
Cheers.
More information about the SpamCop-List
mailing list