[SpamCop-List] Abuse addresses

[Anti-Spam]

I was about to post something in .routing, but figured
maybe I'd start with a more generic question:

I just processed a spam where the parser was
devnulling the results being sent to the originating
e-mail server.  Seems it had decided to use
postmaster@, since nothing was registered with
abuse.net.  My question is, why is postmaster@
better than the registered whois contact address,
and in the future, should these cases be flagged
in .routing?

http://www.spamcop.net/sc?action=rcache;ip=213.215.208.134

Searched through the website FAQs to no avail.

Thanks.

--
Bring in the death penalty for repeat spammers.
Non-functional spambait addr: be at yalefgndoceetv.com
(generated by Webpoison)