[SpamCop-List] Re: "Message body parser requires full, accurate copy of message" again

[Mike Easter]

Geoffrey Welsh wrote:
> Message was delivered directly to SpamCop (i.e., it IS a full,
> accurate copy.)
>
www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z728927016z70f1d854f949531a606a847109217d75z>

That item is 'screwed up' - perhaps starting before it got to SC, but
surely now, because SC has 'compounded' its screwup.

The parts consist of header with [headercontent & boundary information
+ bodycontent & boundary marker in the header + SC Xlines] then the body
which is now without its body content or boundary marker which were
squished up into the header as described and then further screwed up by
SC adding SC Xlines to/below the squished condition.

It should be header with header content & boundary information followed
by the SC Xlines then a space to the body, then the boundary marker and
body content information.

If I dissassemble the screwup and put all of its parts back together
again in the appropriate order, you get this:

www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z728948917z3c8d961d6254e4be09e7eaf43bb1d996z
Report Spam to:
Re: 81.15.194.37 (Administrator of network where email originates)
   To: mkrzysztofowicz at telenergo.pl (Notes)
   To: dolsat#poczta.fm at devnull.spamcop.net (Notes)
Re: 81.15.194.37 (Third party interested in email source)
   To: Cyveillance spam collection (Notes)
Re: http://hjuytr.iaigakbdjj.info/?ixenktiimhj5uice... (Administrator of
network hosting website referenced in spam)
   To: abuse at mci.com (Notes)

which includes finding the links in the b64/d html.

> I have no problem with SpamCop not being able to parse every message
> - and this is a very ugly one, a base 64 encoded HTML attachment with
> no line wraps - but I think that "More information on this error.. "
> is obviously wrong when it says "It is an error introduced by the
> recipient (you) when copying or submitting email to spamcop. If you
> encounter this problem, please review how you submit spam to SpamCop
> and take corrective action" because I didn't submit it - the spammer
> sent it to my @spamcop.net address.

-- 
Mike Easter
kibitzer, not SC admin