[SpamCop-List] Re: Continued Encoded Subject Gags Parser

[Brian (SnSR)]

Mike Easter wrote:
> 32123 wrote:
> www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z728962596z67032fce83e6cb49ced0525698dcbfb5z
> 
> Yes, you are correct.  That improper subject structure bolloxes the
> parse.  Even without the subject, there are no links to be found, tho'.

There may have been links but the message was truncated.

> 
> That subject doesn't work for my mailuser agent either, but that's
> 'partly' because it is a Cyrrilic 1251 charset.  If I had the proper
> charset, and /if/ the subject were constructed properly, my mua should
> decode the b64 and display the chars.  I don't know that the parser
> should be able to accomodate every zany idea someone comes up with for
> some part of a mail.
> 
> Your 368 link which you posted before, whose generic non-spamcop-mail
> link is http://www.spamcop.net/fom-serve/cache/368.html to address the
> issue of how folding should be done doesn't really address this weird
> encoding folding problem.
> 
> I'm not familiar with the smtp RFC for how to properly fold an encoded
> subject line.  I'm pretty sure whatever is going on with that subject
> has nothing to do with any RFC compliance.
> 
>