[SpamCop-List] Re: OT: PING DAVID 1 re messages

[David 1]

Pop wrote:
> David 1,
> I have now received two at-first-appearing irrelevant emails from 
> you at one of my personal email addresses, which, by the way, is 
> essentially a spamtrap, and mostly unused nowadays.
> ---------------------------
> The first one is here:
> http://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z710098164zeb408c19647b1adf2403720d26741711z
> which was just a referral to your su...er site, but quoted part 
> of a post I made to SC.
> ---------------------------------
> The second one is here:
> http://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z710097799za67a97cc4c047f29772a24d5b6bef2cez
> which consisted of:
> -----------
> "Ok, I checked my old records & didn't find them did a google & 
> the
> closest I ot out of the first 200 entries was
> Distance Learning, Online Education, University Of Phoenix Online
> <http://www.tech-technical-institute-101.com/>*...* link exchange
> program | about us Warning: 
> main(/home/rchang/links/php/links.php):
> failed to open stream: No such file or directory in
> /home/*befast*/edu/tt101 *...*
> www.tech-technical-institute-101.com/ - Cached
> <http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:b8pUZ7jZCu4J:www.tech-technical-institute-101.com/+BeFast&hl=en>
> - Similar pages
> <http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=related:www.tech-technical-institute-101.com/>"
> -------------------------------------
> 
> I found it interesting that the two auto-parses (not sent, 
> Cancelled) resulted in two different sets of carriers in the SC 
> listing.  You can see it at the parse references above.  Maybe it 
> was just the mood of the 'net at the time.
>      As you can see, Spampal is also picking you up on 
> blocklists.  The second one has an unmodified Subject line, 
> exactly as my system presented it to me.  Don't recall whether I 
> removed the Spam Pal entry  on the first one or not.
>    To make matters worse, I almost did report the second one.  It 
> wasn't until the last moment that I noticed something in the text 
> that made it look applicable to anything I'd said.  Since I don't 
> normally read spam bodies, it's only because I recognized the 
> David 1 in the From that I caught it.  It is VERY unusual for me 
> to remember newsgroup poster's names.
>    If I initially screwed up and sent something to your personal 
> email address, I apologize because I never meant to.  IMO, you 
> should not use a real address in any newsgroup. 
> Nobody at spamcop.net is still a good one, last I knew.
>     Thus, to prevent further mailings I am using the group to 
> address you.  I will, again, remove your address from my address 
> book.  Please, let's only communicate via the groups and if you 
> DO decide to communicate directly, be certain to make it very 
> obvious very early in the mail that will tell me it's not spam.
>    The first email I suspect was a screwup on my part by hitting 
> the wrong button.  However, the second mail from you appears to 
> be a response I wasn't expecting in my mail box.
> 
> I feel pretty sure you are "innocent" of any intentional 
> wrongdoing, and that I may have compounded the problem, and thus 
> I am giving you wide latitude, and begging the forgiveness of the 
> rest of the group for wasting bandwidth on a pretty much OT 
> subject.
>    My real objections, since I do feel fairly sure you're OK to 
> correspond with, is that if I do continue to communicate with you 
> by email, then most anyone could pose as you and try to trick me 
> into responding to them from my personal addresses.  As in, a 
> spammer who wants to do me bad.   Besides, by communicating 
> off-group, we deprive others of possibly meaningful data since I 
> think you were commenting on the bfast relationship, though it 
> was pretty confusing.
> 
> So, please remove my address from your address book if it was 
> entered there automatically or manually.  I will do the same at 
> my end.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Pop
> 
> 
> 


see s.spam for the message I replied to guess I should be thankful for 
the "wide latitude" You know this is BS I answered the damn message, did 
the search since I couldn't remember my facts at what I thought was your 
request trying to help excuse the hell out of me YES I know better then 
to email off line with out asking first I thought I proved that when I 
asked mike a little while ago. I use my real addy because I dont' hide 
behind nothing I never want to have to hide again but that's for another 
group.
Gee had you written me in private I could have sent the message to you 
in an attachment so that you could see it. Like I said before I've given 
up on who's who around here & maybe it's just ime I left & hopefully 
someone around this place will help if ever I do have a problem I know 
one thing I"m tired of getting jumped around here, sorry folks I never 
claimed to know anything, I just came to see what was going on. Sre hope 
you can take the headers I"m leaving & burn the person that started this 
which is the person that sent me the note NOT me for the record.

-- 

David 1
bad addy
spamtrap at suescornerweb.com