[SpamCop-List] Re: Internal spamcop handling = PAY US AND NOT GET LISTED?

[Mike Easter]

NerdRevenge wrote:
> Yahoo must be paying off spamcop to not get listed.

There isn't anything about reporting that particular spam which would
contribute to the SC blocklist.

The blocklist is based on reports from reporters or spamtraps which are
parsed for the spamsource.  That spamsource, in this case the .my
provider, not yahoo, scores a count toward being listed.

The listing process itself is 'algorithmic' -- based on the
'mathematics' described here
http://www.spamcop.net/fom-serve/cache/297.html   What is the SpamCop
Blocking List (SCBL)?

The other reporting which would come out of that notify would be the
websites, which do /not/ contribute to the blocklist.  The notification
for that would be the internal handling of SC to yahoo and the
devnull/ed notify about the www.veenaimovies.com spamvertisement,
because those notifies bounce.

Your repetitive remarks about yahoo paying off spamcop to not get listed
indicate that you don't have a good understanding of how the SC
blocklisting process works, and also that you haven't looked around the
newsgroups to see the complaints about SC listing the yahoo mail servers
in the newsgroup subject "Why are you blocking Yahoo Groups ???"

-- 
Mike Easter
kibitzer, not SC admin