[SpamCop-List] Re: RE:reportid 1330833126

[Adam]

So if I make sure we make it

([TheUsersRealReverseAddress] [[TheUsersRealIPAddress]])
by smtp-out.load.com (loadmail) with HTTP id 2CBEDD68021

the chain will be complete and there will not be a problem recursing back ?

Thanks

Adam


"Mike Easter" <MikeE at ster.invalid> wrote in message
news:crur5s$nq2$1 at news.spamcop.net...
> adam at loadmail.com wrote:
> > So you are saying that if I change our systems to include a revcived
> > line like the following that it would start to list the actual
> > machines the users are sending as the source.
> >
> >
> > Received: from [TheUsersRealReverseAddress]
> > ([TheUsersRealReverseAddress] [[TheUsersRealIPAddress]])
> >>  by webmail.rock.com (loadmail) with HTTP id 2CBEDD68021
>
> Yes;  it doesn't even have to be that 'good' re all of the elements of
> the rDNS or helo- but it is imperative that the IP address be in the
> 'from' field and that the condition of the line /above/ that one can be
> chained properly to the 'by' field of the line you fabricated here.
>
> Here's a little problem right now:
>
> 209.58.232.26  rDNS  smtp-out.load.com
>
> but the 'by' in your line sez webmail.rock.com;  rock's MX is
> 209.58.237.12
>
> There's a little confusion in parsing back thru' there, where 'there' is
> the line I posted earlier [below], and the line you posted above,
> depending on how you configure it.
>
>
> >> Received: from smtp-out.load.com (smtp-out.load.com [209.58.232.26])
>
>
> -- 
> Mike Easter
> kibitzer, not SC admin
>