[SpamCop-List] Re: Third party interested?

[David 1]

Mike Easter wrote:
> Anti-Spam wrote:
> 
>>I just noticed in a report that a "third party interested"
>>was @devnull.spamcop.net, with the recipient
>>bouncing 50% of the thousands of LARTs
>>(216.108.233.11).  Anyone know if this sort of thing
>>causes excessive unuseful load on the SC servers?
>>Presumably a 50% bounce rate meant that the
>>address was useful at one time, but thousands of
>>LARTs would seem to imply a not particularly white
>>ISP.
> 
> 
> I think some third parties have an interest but aren't expecting so many
> SC reports.
> 
> My default for 3rd parties is off/unchecked.
> 

if there is ever a third party that you think should be used I'm asuming 
that you will post it here. When I first joined I saw your post about 
this in another thread & turned mine off that day (NOTE this was after 
reading what felt like 100 of yourpost to see if I should follow your 
lead, one of my first days here.) Any way I would hope that you would.

-- 

David 1
bad addy
spamtrap at suescornerweb.com