[SpamCop-List] Re: Misdirected Bounces Q & A
MikeE at ster.invalid
Tue Mar 15 14:25:43 EST 2005
Sofa King Tyred of Lar Ting wrote:
> See also:
> Mike won't like this because the word "bounce" is used througout ;-)
> BTW, I agree with his stance on this point.
On the one hand, the word bounce /was/ used all over the place on that
page -- but on the other hand, I luv the spamlinks site; and on the
other other hand [for those of you who have some extras], that page does
a great job of comprehensively discussing bouncing, rejecting, and
properly configuring servers to cope with some issues.
If the word bounce /is/ ever used 'loosely', it should be accompanied by
a page like that to avoid any ambiguity. ;-)
That page also has a link to a discussion of the fake bounce, including
the par 'fake bounces considered harmful' and a list of a bunch of
products which perform fake bounces, which I'd never seen before. I
should be beating up on more than MailWasher.
kibitzer, not SC admin
More information about the SpamCop-List