[SpamCop-List]
Re: XO spam (tradepointone,pinpointmoney,servingones etc. (dot)com)
not CanSpam compliant
Cat
nobody at devnull.spamcop.net
Sun May 29 21:45:29 EDT 2005
Berny wrote:
> Folks,
>
> It just occurred to me that this spew originating within USA (straight up
> actually), received by servers within USA is in gross violation of CanSpam
> by not giving any visible means to unsubscribe.
>
> (I get a blank message window in Yahoo, and no unsubscribe is visible in a
> plain text rendering , as I might see in "View Original Spam")
>
> Now it could be that some of the image links might point to an unsub, but
> why should I
>
> A) read the message while online,
>
> B) Enable rendering/resolving foreign (not on my machine) links and images,
>
> C) Enable HTML rendering at all? (which by the way wouldn't fix it for these
> items)
>
> Now, unfortunuately I don't personally reside in the USA, so I can't do
> anything but surely there is a litigous person receiving this crap who is?
> Or someone who knows a prosecutor with time on his/her hands. (yeah right)
>
> Registrants, sending hosts, DNS hosts, Spamvertized sites, ISP, all are USA
> based. (XO/Whoa.com)
Are you still getting this spam? I suspect they finally listwashed me
over the past few days. I finally got a couple of human replies back
from someone saying something like "we passed the complaint to our
customer to take action against this spammer." Translation: "We know our
customer is the spammer himself and had him listwash you, but we won't
admit that to you."
Here are three addresses with the resolution team that should get a
human response for you:
resolutionteam at support.xohost.com, monica.henderson at xo.com,
jim.tobias at xo.com
Also a snippet of the e-mail from Monica Henderson:
"* The owner of the circuit has been contacted twice
regarding unsolicited messaging coming from their
XO circuit. Once previous to this escalation, and
the 2nd time regarding it.
* A sampling of complaints / evidence has been
forwarded
the owner of the company for their direct
action.
* Both times the company has taken the appropriate
action
according to our and their Terms of Service /
Acceptable
Use Policy, and has indicated their willingness to
enforce those policies in a responsible manner
with
all their clients.
* Through this effort at an educational
solution/resolution
to violations of the XO AUP, whereby the customer
and their
clients online behavior would be modified to
comply with the
AUP -- it may come to the point, within the next
week, where
the modification/adherence proves to be too much
for both
the customer and XO.
Please feel free to continue to send any complaints
regarding this issue to myself
monica.henderson at xo.com and also to Jim Tobias
jim.tobias at xo.com."
More information about the SpamCop-List
mailing list