[SpamCop-List] Re: SPF record + domain literal format

[Jeff G.]

"wayne" <wayne at schlitt.net> wrote in message
news:x4zmoty436.fsf at footbone.schlitt.net...
> In <djss9q$p95$1 at news.spamcop.net> "HOLLO Peter Mr. \(ICM Rt.\)"
<peter.hollo at im.icm.hu> writes:
> > Besides I would like to ask what is your opinion about x.y at ipaddress
type
> > receiving.
> >
> > Do you usually configure it ? If yes then did it cause any problem ?
>
> I do not accept IP literals in email addresses, and I haven't had any
> problems.  Even the rfc-ignorant.org folks aren't anal enough to
> consider rejecting IP literals to be a problem.


IIRC an ippostmaster zone was proposed, but there was little support for
it.  And BTW, the syntax is "postmaster@[127.0.0.1]".

-- 
Best Regards,  Jeff G.
I have been a SpamCop User/Member/Customer since 1999 and am a
Moderator of the new web-based forums (now the primary method for
getting help, http://forum.spamcop.net).  Please contact me via Forum.