[SpamCop-List] Re: Messages with No Subject Header and No Message Body (Again)

[Frank Ellermann]

Mike Easter wrote:

> It is for approved submitters who also much be mailhosted.

It was the opposite for me, I configured mailhosts immediately
after an "accident" (40 quick reports to my own ISP when SC
had an obscure DNS problem confusing the ordinary chain test).

Maybe it's a MUST (RfC upper case) now, minimally a SHOULD.
 
> maybe the parser just 'stops' before it even determines
> if it is empty or not.

Yes, from my POV that's a feature.  Bye, Frank