Re: Messages with No Subject Header and No Message Body (Again)
nobody at xyzzy.claranet.de
Sat Nov 5 00:10:33 EST 2005
Mike Easter wrote:
> It is for approved submitters who also much be mailhosted.
It was the opposite for me, I configured mailhosts immediately
after an "accident" (40 quick reports to my own ISP when SC
had an obscure DNS problem confusing the ordinary chain test).
Maybe it's a MUST (RfC upper case) now, minimally a SHOULD.
> maybe the parser just 'stops' before it even determines
> if it is empty or not.
Yes, from my POV that's a feature. Bye, Frank
More information about the SpamCop-List