[SpamCop-List] Re: Shaw Cable Refuses Munged Reports
bar_n0ne at hotmail.com
Sat Oct 15 17:00:29 EDT 2005
"spamacyde" <mwnospam at comcast.net> wrote in message
news:diqoht$rnu$1 at news.spamcop.net...
> Since Shaw Cable refuses munged reports, do I want to have Spamcop report
> spam to them? Why should this be my decision? Doesn't Spamcop know
> they are trustworthy or not?
> Thanks in advance.
I think they are trustworthy, they are a major ISP. Others may have a
I've never seen spamvertizing from their network, and most senders seem to
be zombied PC's or otherwise compromised systems.
I don;t know how SC could be expected to keep up with all the possible abuse
addresses.and their "trustworthyness"
If you're not sure don't tick them.
This is as good a place as any to find out. You can also vet comments from
others by googling for the ISP here (this "group"), and in NANAE.
More information about the SpamCop-List