[SpamCop-List] Re: 126.96.36.199
le_iota at used-to-be-free.fr.invalid
Fri Sep 16 12:05:57 EDT 2005
Mike Easter wrote:
> There's no tracker, so we aren't actually talking about any particular
I gave a tracker in my previous message.
> What exactly do you want to call a 'roach' -- the notify address to
> which SC extends the courtesy of a notify? Or something else?
> Is the IP a roach? What is the roach? I'm still not clear.
No ambiguity there else at all. An IP *is not* a roach It may *shelter*
a roach. An address *is not* a roach either. It may be *owned* by a
roach. A spam *is not* a roach. A spammer *is* always a roach. A hoster.
If mycyberhosting closes the account of the spammer and dedicate the
machine that was previously used by the spammer to mirror samspade's or
DNSBL the IP will not have anything to do with a roach....
Anyhow the purpose is not to kick the roach (any evidence that we get)
but to stop its move (to stop spam activity)
More information about the SpamCop-List