[SpamCop-List] Re: Is it possible to submit spam via email without having to verify it online?

[WazoO]

"Mike Easter" <MikeE at ster.invalid> wrote in message
news:e1e4la$oj0$1 at news.spamcop.net...
>
> The forum link is non-specific about being careful.  Skiwi's post
> specifically describes a method for being careful.  That is what
> Anonymous was talking about.  If the suggestion had been placed in the
> forum page, then the link would have been appropriate.  But it wasn't
> and it wasnt'.

Yet again, the user-to-user thing appears to have been overlooked /
ignored.  That the Forum version of the SpamCop FAQ is listed as
being "Under Development" ... gets changed / updated pretty
regularly .... hasn't been included in your diatribe.  This version of
the SpamCop FAQ isn't limited to "me" making changes to it.

As it is, I've been banging code on the Wiki all morning ..  and
a bit amazed that you have yet to set foot there to get involved
and help "fix" the FAQ problem .... yet make this complaint yet
again ....  I just replied to another posting which also included the
fact that the "official" answer was not archived due to Don's
newsreader configuration.

My thing isn't the newsgroup versus the Forum, it's the data that
folks are looking for.  I've gone through 5 different FAQ software
packages, hacked that single-page access monster together, tossed
together that portal page, added in a mod to the Forum app to throw
in yet another FAQ interface, and have been working on a Wiki.
Once again, why is the problem with FAQ data "mine" ...????
A gazillion SpamCop.net users but I'm a prick because no one
else wants to take on the task of helping out?

Stated many times, if the FAQ isn't "good" .... offer up something
that will work .... I'm pretty tired of going round and round with
Don/Deputies over the 'official' FAQ seemingly all by myself.
And you'll notice that the alternative versions I've offered were
not "written by me" .... it's been a collaborative effort.