[SpamCop.net - protecting the internet through technology]

[SpamCop-List] Re: abuse-noverbose@uu.net refuses spamcop reports (Ping Ellen)

WazoO nobody at devnull.spamcop.net
Thu Feb 2 01:31:35 EST 2006


"Redstone" <redford_stone at INVERSE_OF_COLDmail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns975DECD66578Etinlc at 216.154.195.61...
>
> http://www.spamcop.net/sc?
> id=z867996338z4df3aab925454335efb71c1f184eeabfz
>
> abuse-noverbose at uu.net redirects to abuse at uu.net
> abuse-noverbose at uu.net refuses spamcop reports
> Spam report id 1644010398 sent to: spamcop at imaphost.com
> Spam report id 1644010415 sent to: spam at uce.gov
> Spam report id 1644010425 sent to: abuse at uu.net
>
> Got the above response after reporting a spam in my wife's email
> account. Is this correct? uu.net/mci.com does not want SC reports
> anymore or is this a case of MCI-sends-spamcop-report-to-spammer and the
> spammer responds by screwing with the abuse handling settings?
>
> (More interesting is that the other uu.net abuse address is unaffected.)

Actually, the "other" uu.net address is the key, meaning that you
have in fact sent your notify.  The 'no-verbose' is basically the
'same' address, just no big auto-ack returned.  Allowing both
reports to go out would simply be double-reporting to the
same folks.




More information about the SpamCop-List mailing list