Re: firstname.lastname@example.org refuses spamcop reports (Ping Ellen)
redford_stone at INVERSE_OF_COLDmail.com
Thu Feb 2 10:44:57 EST 2006
"WazoO" <nobody at devnull.spamcop.net> wrote in news:drscgn$ctt$1
> Actually, the "other" uu.net address is the key, meaning that you
> have in fact sent your notify. The 'no-verbose' is basically the
> 'same' address, just no big auto-ack returned. Allowing both
> reports to go out would simply be double-reporting to the
> same folks.
That other one was for reporting the link in the reported spam. The
first (non-verbose) address was for the IP address from which the spam
originated. (Both on MCI/UU obviously.)
Good point about the problem with double-reporting. But what if there is
a situation where it is only originating IP address rather than both?
(i.e. only reporting address is the non-verbose address.)
More information about the SpamCop-List