[SpamCop-List] Re: abuse-noverbose@uu.net refuses spamcop reports (Ping Ellen)

[Redstone]

"WazoO" <nobody at devnull.spamcop.net> wrote in news:drscgn$ctt$1
@news.spamcop.net:

> 
> Actually, the "other" uu.net address is the key, meaning that you
> have in fact sent your notify.  The 'no-verbose' is basically the
> 'same' address, just no big auto-ack returned.  Allowing both
> reports to go out would simply be double-reporting to the
> same folks.
> 

That other one was for reporting the link in the reported spam. The 
first (non-verbose) address was for the IP address from which the spam 
originated. (Both on MCI/UU obviously.)

Good point about the problem with double-reporting. But what if there is 
a situation where it is only originating IP address rather than both? 
(i.e. only reporting address is the non-verbose address.)