[SpamCop-List] Re: Thunderbird OK with Headers
nobody at devnull.spamcop.net
Sun Jan 1 10:05:33 EST 2006
"Mike Easter" <MikeE at ster.invalid> wrote in message
news:dp7eb3$4ou$1 at news.spamcop.net...
> MikeV06 wrote:
> > I am thinking about using Thunderbird for email. I know OL has a
> > problem with headers and just wondered if Thunderbird works OK when
> > forwarding spam to SC?
> It looks to me like SC's faq is in serious need of updating....
You think so? (Me thinking of the dozens and dozens of previous
threads about something to do with a SpamCop FAQ, the tons
of my e-mail archives on my attempts at getting some things added,
changed, updated, deleted, etc.)
> I guess everyone who could do some updating is obsessed with the web
???? not sure what the "web interface" thing is. The last "go round" on the
www.spamcop.net web page(s) dealt with information on the reporting system
> Somehow the web interface is immediately amedable to updating but the
> webfaq is somehow impenetrable. Funny how that works.
R.W. states that changes on the "official" FAQ now need to be walked
though a corporate maze, to include legal ... so it mostly doesn't happen.
> I think the solution to the whole thing is one of who is responsible. I
> think the webfaq needs a 'signature' which sez --- "I am responsible for
> keeping the webfaq up-to-date" -- Signed, XXX
> Once you have to show your 'face' about being responsible for something,
> then everything starts getting better.
Julian started it, Dollface was involved, R.W. picked it up, IronPort staff
got involved ..... see above for "who's involved" these days.
More information about the SpamCop-List