[SpamCop-List] Re: Thunderbird OK with Headers

[WazoO]

"Mike Easter" <MikeE at ster.invalid> wrote in message
news:dp7eb3$4ou$1 at news.spamcop.net...
> MikeV06 wrote:
> > I am thinking about using Thunderbird for email. I know OL has a
> > problem with headers and just wondered if Thunderbird works OK when
> > forwarding spam to SC?
>
> It looks to me like SC's faq is in serious need of updating....

You think so?  (Me thinking of the dozens and dozens of previous
threads about something to do with a SpamCop FAQ, the tons
of my e-mail archives on my attempts at getting some things added,
changed, updated, deleted, etc.)

> I guess everyone who could do some updating is obsessed with the web
> interface.

???? not sure what the "web interface" thing is.  The last "go round" on the
www.spamcop.net web page(s) dealt with information on the reporting system
ourages.

> Somehow the web interface is immediately amedable to updating but the
> webfaq is somehow impenetrable.  Funny how that works.

R.W. states that changes on the "official" FAQ now need to be walked
though a corporate maze, to include legal ... so it mostly doesn't happen.

> I think the solution to the whole thing is one of who is responsible.  I
> think the webfaq needs a 'signature' which sez --- "I am responsible for
> keeping the webfaq up-to-date"  -- Signed, XXX
>
> Once you have to show your 'face' about being responsible for something,
> then everything starts getting better.

Julian started it, Dollface was involved, R.W. picked it up, IronPort staff
got involved ..... see above for "who's involved" these days.