From nobody at spamcop.net Fri Mar 27 00:30:01 2009 From: nobody at spamcop.net (Ellen) Date: Sat Apr 25 08:27:11 2009 Subject: [SpamCop-List] Re: Scheduled Maintenance Thursday March 26, 2009 - (SpamCop4.5.0-084 Release) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: RW wrote: > RW wrote: > Visitors will see the SpamCop reporting website in > "Maintenance Mode" through the process. > > Emailed spam submissions will still be accepted, but processing will be > delayed. It will no doubt take a few hours to catch up with the backlog > when things are brought back up. > > Richard The maintenance is running longer than expected. Thanks for your patience. Ellen SpamCop From nobody at spamcop.net Fri Mar 27 01:20:02 2009 From: nobody at spamcop.net (RW) Date: Sat Apr 25 08:27:37 2009 Subject: [SpamCop-List] Re: Scheduled Maintenance Thursday March 26, 2009 - (SpamCop4.5.0-084 Release) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Ellen wrote: > RW wrote: >> RW wrote: >> Visitors will see the SpamCop reporting website in "Maintenance Mode" >> through the process. >> >> Emailed spam submissions will still be accepted, but processing will >> be delayed. It will no doubt take a few hours to catch up with the >> backlog when things are brought back up. >> >> Richard > > > > The maintenance is running longer than expected. Thanks for your patience. > > > Ellen > SpamCop We're told another 1/2 hour or so Richard From nobody at spamcop.net Fri Mar 27 03:00:02 2009 From: nobody at spamcop.net (Steven Underwood) Date: Sat Apr 25 08:28:25 2009 Subject: [SpamCop-List] Re: Scheduled Maintenance Thursday March 26, 2009 - (SpamCop 4.5.0-084 Release) References: Message-ID: "RW" wrote in message news:gqh60n$g71$1@news.spamcop.net... > > We're told another 1/2 hour or so > > Richard While I see that the reporting site appears to be up, I am getting the following error trying to reach the VER site from my logged in account: Cannot find login information. Not logged in? VER tends to be a lot quicker getting messages into the queue as opposed to forwarding from webmail, but I will revert back to that if necessary. From nobody at spamcop.net Fri Mar 27 03:50:01 2009 From: nobody at spamcop.net (RW) Date: Sat Apr 25 08:28:54 2009 Subject: [SpamCop-List] Re: Scheduled Maintenance Thursday March 26, 2009 - (SpamCop4.5.0-084 Release) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Steven Underwood wrote: > > > "RW" wrote in message > news:gqh60n$g71$1@news.spamcop.net... >> >> We're told another 1/2 hour or so >> >> Richard > > While I see that the reporting site appears to be up, I am getting the > following error trying to reach the VER site from my logged in account: > > Cannot find login information. Not logged in? > > VER tends to be a lot quicker getting messages into the queue as opposed > to forwarding from webmail, but I will revert back to that if necessary. I'm getting some 'failed to load spam header' error when parsing. Reloading once or twice gets the parse. I suspect the error your seeing is also the databases catching up with each other. I suspect the servers are overloaded with trying to catch up. I'm not going to ring any alarm bells just yet. Things look good in the crons, though one cron that normally takes a minute or so has been running for an hour. Only apps 4 and 7 are showing room to take on load, but not much. The other 10 must be churning away. Richard From nobody at devnull.spamcop.net Fri Mar 27 04:55:02 2009 From: nobody at devnull.spamcop.net (Patto) Date: Sat Apr 25 08:29:19 2009 Subject: [SpamCop-List] Strange going-ons... Message-ID: I send a group of spam messages to SC, receive a confirmation "has received x emails", then proceed to http://www.spamcop.net/ I click on the 'Report Now' link, and SC brings up, e.g. http://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z2734993992zda2bce77d70854a4b359bfcd7876a0d2z I click on 'Send Spam Report(s) Now', and the thing seems to be gone. The 'Report Now' link comes back, but interestingly its color is of a link already visited. When I click on it, the same spam as above comes back, but as 'already sent'. This seems to report itself with every second submission. This behavior is new as per today. From nobody at spamcop.net Fri Mar 27 05:30:01 2009 From: nobody at spamcop.net (RW) Date: Sat Apr 25 08:29:31 2009 Subject: [SpamCop-List] Re: Strange going-ons... In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Patto wrote: > I send a group of spam messages to SC, receive a confirmation "has > received x emails", then proceed to http://www.spamcop.net/ > > I click on the 'Report Now' link, and SC brings up, e.g. > http://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z2734993992zda2bce77d70854a4b359bfcd7876a0d2z > > I click on 'Send Spam Report(s) Now', and the thing seems to be gone. > The 'Report Now' link comes back, but interestingly its color is of a > link already visited. When I click on it, the same spam as above comes > back, but as 'already sent'. > > This seems to report itself with every second submission. This behavior > is new as per today. Thanks Patto. I think this is all related to the systems still trying to catch up. Sysops also reported a database hard crash, which has now been brought back up. SpamCop is very much a strange puppy. I think operations forget the loads that go through SC and the effects this has for a number of hours when the system is taken down. The longer its down, the larger and longer the effect. I think all totaled, they had the system down for about five hours. That would equate to about five million spam backed up in the corpus for processing. Richard From nobody at devnull.spamcop.net Fri Mar 27 05:30:01 2009 From: nobody at devnull.spamcop.net (Patto) Date: Sat Apr 25 08:29:33 2009 Subject: [SpamCop-List] Re: Strange going-ons... In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Patto wrote: > I send a group of spam messages to SC, receive a confirmation "has > received x emails", then proceed to http://www.spamcop.net/ > > I click on the 'Report Now' link, and SC brings up, e.g. > http://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z2734993992zda2bce77d70854a4b359bfcd7876a0d2z > > I click on 'Send Spam Report(s) Now', and the thing seems to be gone. > The 'Report Now' link comes back, but interestingly its color is of a > link already visited. When I click on it, the same spam as above comes > back, but as 'already sent'. > > This seems to report itself with every second submission. This behavior > is new as per today. This is the latest one: http://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z2735077515z8fbea25e41887db3966fa300050d4c6az but it behaves differently; it just brings up the 'Report Now' link, again, and again, and again. Previously it brought up the link once, then continued to the next. Now this one seems to go on endless... From nobody at spamcop.net Fri Mar 27 06:15:01 2009 From: nobody at spamcop.net (RW) Date: Sat Apr 25 08:29:49 2009 Subject: [SpamCop-List] Re: Strange going-ons... In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Patto wrote: > Patto wrote: >> I send a group of spam messages to SC, receive a confirmation "has >> received x emails", then proceed to http://www.spamcop.net/ >> >> I click on the 'Report Now' link, and SC brings up, e.g. >> http://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z2734993992zda2bce77d70854a4b359bfcd7876a0d2z >> >> >> I click on 'Send Spam Report(s) Now', and the thing seems to be gone. >> The 'Report Now' link comes back, but interestingly its color is of a >> link already visited. When I click on it, the same spam as above comes >> back, but as 'already sent'. >> >> This seems to report itself with every second submission. This >> behavior is new as per today. > > This is the latest one: > http://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z2735077515z8fbea25e41887db3966fa300050d4c6az > but it behaves differently; it just brings up the 'Report Now' link, > again, and again, and again. Previously it brought up the link once, > then continued to the next. Now this one seems to go on endless... Yeah, seeing a few reports of this as well as a couple of other small issues. There seems to be a problem in the system refresh or moving on, or whatever you wanna call it. Sysops is aware and we're watching this. Still think it's related to things catching up. Richard From arrNOT_EXISTon at ComFakeKalDomain.net Fri Mar 27 09:35:01 2009 From: arrNOT_EXISTon at ComFakeKalDomain.net (Ian Manners) Date: Sat Apr 25 08:31:22 2009 Subject: [SpamCop-List] Re: Strange going-ons... In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: All I'm getting right now is :- SpamCop v 4.5.0.084 ? 1992-2009 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Failed to load spam header: 2735576097 / 841414cb3fd4e99b03bd27e316fe20a6 on any spam I submit using the interface, also have the same problem with 'link' when I submit via email so I cancelled the lot. Cheers IBManners From arrNOT_EXISTon at ComFakeKalDomain.net Fri Mar 27 10:30:10 2009 From: arrNOT_EXISTon at ComFakeKalDomain.net (Ian Manners) Date: Sat Apr 25 08:31:47 2009 Subject: [SpamCop-List] Re: Strange going-ons... In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: > SpamCop v 4.5.0.084 ? 1992-2009 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. > Failed to load spam header: 2735576097 / 841414cb3fd4e99b03bd27e316fe20a6 Now working :-) Cheers IBManners From nobody at spamcop.net Fri Mar 27 11:50:01 2009 From: nobody at spamcop.net (Ellen) Date: Sat Apr 25 08:32:19 2009 Subject: [SpamCop-List] copy/paste spam failure to parse error Message-ID: I am seeing an error when pasting a spam into the parse box on the website: Failed to load spam header: 2735866410 / 805239687db8961c08c1bcb33d628258 We are notifying Operations and engineering about this. If you can successfully copy/paste spam into the webform please drop a short post to this newsgroup. Thanks Ellen SpamCop From blacklist-me at davjam.org Fri Mar 27 13:35:01 2009 From: blacklist-me at davjam.org (David Bolt) Date: Sat Apr 25 08:33:27 2009 Subject: [SpamCop-List] Re: copy/paste spam failure to parse error References: Message-ID: On Fri, 27 Mar 2009, Ellen wrote:- >I am seeing an error when pasting a spam into the parse box on the website: > >Failed to load spam header: 2735866410 / 805239687db8961c08c1bcb33d628258 > >We are notifying Operations and engineering about this. > >If you can successfully copy/paste spam into the webform please drop a >short post to this newsgroup. Looks like whatever was broken is now fixed. Just copied and pasted a spam and received no errors. Regards, David Bolt -- Team Acorn: http://www.distributed.net/ OGR-NG @ ~100Mnodes RC5-72 @ ~1Mkeys/s openSUSE 10.3 32b | openSUSE 11.0 32b | | openSUSE 10.3 64b | openSUSE 11.0 64b | openSUSE 11.1 64b | openSUSE 10.3 PPC | RISC OS 3.6 | RISC OS 3.11 | TOS 4.02 From connyank at cox.net Fri Mar 27 13:45:02 2009 From: connyank at cox.net (jg) Date: Sat Apr 25 08:33:35 2009 Subject: [SpamCop-List] Re: copy/paste spam failure to parse error In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On 03/27/2009 03:45 AM Ellen scribbled: > I am seeing an error when pasting a spam into the parse box on the website: > > Failed to load spam header: 2735866410 / 805239687db8961c08c1bcb33d628258 > > We are notifying Operations and engineering about this. > > If you can successfully copy/paste spam into the webform please drop a > short post to this newsgroup. > > > Thanks > > > Ellen > SpamCop Not yet... From nobody at spamcop.net Fri Mar 27 14:05:01 2009 From: nobody at spamcop.net (Ellen) Date: Sat Apr 25 08:33:39 2009 Subject: [SpamCop-List] Re: copy/paste spam failure to parse error In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: David Bolt wrote: > On Fri, 27 Mar 2009, Ellen wrote:- > >> I am seeing an error when pasting a spam into the parse box on the website: >> >> Failed to load spam header: 2735866410 / 805239687db8961c08c1bcb33d628258 >> >> We are notifying Operations and engineering about this. >> >> If you can successfully copy/paste spam into the webform please drop a >> short post to this newsgroup. > > Looks like whatever was broken is now fixed. Just copied and pasted a > spam and received no errors. > > > Regards, > David Bolt > Still not working for me -- thanks for the info. Ellen Spamcop From bert at iphouse.com Fri Mar 27 14:15:01 2009 From: bert at iphouse.com (Bert Hyman) Date: Sat Apr 25 08:33:54 2009 Subject: [SpamCop-List] Re: Strange going-ons... References: Message-ID: In news:gqhilo$ndf$1@news.spamcop.net Patto wrote: > I click on 'Send Spam Report(s) Now', and the thing seems to be gone. > The 'Report Now' link comes back, but interestingly its color is of a > link already visited. When I click on it, the same spam as above comes > back, but as 'already sent'. Me too. Exiting and re-entering my browser cleared things up though. -- Bert Hyman St. Paul, MN bert@iphouse.com From nobody at spamcop.net Fri Mar 27 14:50:01 2009 From: nobody at spamcop.net (Ellen) Date: Sat Apr 25 08:34:20 2009 Subject: [SpamCop-List] Re: copy/paste spam failure to parse error In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Larry in AZ wrote: >>>> >>> >>> Still not working for me -- thanks for the info. >> For me, a few parse and some don't. Same error message. > > But they work if I forward via email. > thanks Ellen From user at domain.invalid Fri Mar 27 16:05:01 2009 From: user at domain.invalid (Farelf) Date: Sat Apr 25 08:34:55 2009 Subject: [SpamCop-List] Re: copy/paste spam failure to parse error In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Ellen wrote: > I am seeing an error when pasting a spam into the parse box on the website: > > Failed to load spam header: 2735866410 / 805239687db8961c08c1bcb33d628258 > Worked on 4th try (IE7): http://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z2736401501z6848f924898018dd4dced63063787cf3z () From ppearson at nowhere.invalid Fri Mar 27 16:05:01 2009 From: ppearson at nowhere.invalid (Peter Pearson) Date: Sat Apr 25 08:35:02 2009 Subject: [SpamCop-List] Re: copy/paste spam failure to parse error References: Message-ID: On Fri, 27 Mar 2009 06:45:15 -0400, Ellen wrote: > I am seeing an error when pasting a spam into the parse box on the website: > > Failed to load spam header: 2735866410 / 805239687db8961c08c1bcb33d628258 I just got a similar error, differing only in the numbers: Failed to load spam header: 2736430959 / fd656a0fc730e5bf15cee88f0e129706 - Peter -- To email me, substitute nowhere->spamcop, invalid->net. From connyank at cox.net Fri Mar 27 16:15:02 2009 From: connyank at cox.net (jg) Date: Sat Apr 25 08:35:06 2009 Subject: [SpamCop-List] Re: copy/paste spam failure to parse error In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On 03/27/2009 06:41 AM Larry in AZ scribbled: >>> >>> Still not working for me -- thanks for the info. >> For me, a few parse and some don't. Same error message. > > But they work if I forward via email. > I found that hitting Open Location (Firefox) while in the error screen screen pushes the parse through - 2 out of 3, other one went through OK. This is copy and paste into web parser. No more to test since 6:15 PST - slow day... From nobody at spamcop.net Fri Mar 27 17:05:02 2009 From: nobody at spamcop.net (Ellen) Date: Sat Apr 25 08:35:50 2009 Subject: [SpamCop-List] Re: copy/paste spam failure to parse error In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Peter Pearson wrote: > On Fri, 27 Mar 2009 06:45:15 -0400, Ellen wrote: >> I am seeing an error when pasting a spam into the parse box on the website: >> >> Failed to load spam header: 2735866410 / 805239687db8961c08c1bcb33d628258 > > I just got a similar error, differing only in the numbers: > > Failed to load spam header: 2736430959 / fd656a0fc730e5bf15cee88f0e129706 > > - Peter > yes the numbers will differ -- I should have mentioned that in my previous post. Sometimes if you retry enough times you can get the spam to parse Ellen From bcs1 at spamcop.net Fri Mar 27 17:20:01 2009 From: bcs1 at spamcop.net (Bill) Date: Sat Apr 25 08:36:00 2009 Subject: [SpamCop-List] Re: Strange going-ons... References: Message-ID: "RW" wrote in message news:gqhn77$324$1@news.spamcop.net... > > Yeah, seeing a few reports of this as well as a couple of other small > issues. There seems to be a problem in the system refresh or moving on, > or whatever you wanna call it. Sysops is aware and we're watching this. > Still think it's related to things catching up. > > Richard I'm seeing it too, but since you guys are already aware of it... also the report now link issue of not moving to the next queue'd for reporting spam. I was able to switch to the held mail tab then back for one of them, but that only seemed to work once. Thanks Bill From me at privacy.net Fri Mar 27 22:45:02 2009 From: me at privacy.net (Michael R N Dolbear) Date: Sat Apr 25 08:39:22 2009 Subject: [SpamCop-List] Re: Scheduled Maintenance Thursday March 26, 2009 - (SpamCop 4.5.0-084 Release) References: Message-ID: <01c9af1e$f71073a0$LocalHost@default> Steven Underwood wrote > While I see that the reporting site appears to be up, I am getting the > following error trying to reach the VER site from my logged in account: > > Cannot find login information. Not logged in? > > VER tends to be a lot quicker getting messages into the queue as opposed to > forwarding from webmail, but I will revert back to that if necessary. I'm still getting that at 1800 GMT , but only if I go to (from SC mail or bookmark) http://mailsc.spamcop.net/reportheld?action=heldlog (and I can look at my old reports so it does know I'm logged in) If I login at the "cannot find login ..." message I get sent to a different VER url http://www.spamcop.net/reportheld?action=heldlog Which works. What's going on ? -- Mike D From nobody at spamcop.net Sat Mar 28 01:25:01 2009 From: nobody at spamcop.net (RW) Date: Sat Apr 25 08:40:41 2009 Subject: [SpamCop-List] All Fixed?? Message-ID: Reports from Engineering are they found a problem between the master and slave databases. This has been fixed now, so the parsing problems/errors should be gone. They also found a coding in the held mail coding, which has been fixed. Held mail '500' errors should now be gone They've also fixed the apnic problem and abuse.net problem, so those should be fixed. Let us know if you're still seeing any error or come across any new ones. Thanks, Richard From ecm2001.download at xxxx54545.rapidshare.com Sat Mar 28 04:40:02 2009 From: ecm2001.download at xxxx54545.rapidshare.com (ecm2001 rapidshare download torrent ) Date: Sat Apr 25 08:41:52 2009 Subject: [SpamCop-List] ecm2001 crack torrent rapidshare download 57400710144836480355 Message-ID: We can crack or emulate any protection type: Dongle, Hardlock, Hasp, Serial, Password, Hasp4, Flexlm, Sentinel, Wibu, Eutron Smartkey, Hasphl, Proteq, All the Protections!! email = xshowsoft@gmail.com email = xshowsoft at gmail.com ecm2001 download ecm2001 rapidshare ecm2001 torrent ecm2001 crack ecm2001 v 5.3 ecm2001 v 5.4 ecm2001 v 5.5 ecm2001 v 6.0 ecm2001 v 6.1 ecm2001 v 6.2 ecm2001 v 6.3 ecm2001 v5.3 ecm2001 v5.4 ecm2001 v5.5 ecm2001 v6.0 ecm2001 v6.1 ecm2001 v6.2 ecm2001 v6.3 If you have some protected program, and want to crack it, we can help you! Ecm2001 v6.3 professional, all checksums enabled download email = xshowsoft@gmail.com email = xshowsoft at gmail.com g#SO,]_g*y1(,qgJJeZO From gezgin at spamcop.net.which.is.not.invalid Sat Mar 28 05:45:01 2009 From: gezgin at spamcop.net.which.is.not.invalid (Opinicus) Date: Sat Apr 25 08:42:25 2009 Subject: [SpamCop-List] Re: All Fixed?? References: Message-ID: "RW" wrote > Let us know if you're still seeing any error or come across any new ones. It's 04:40 UTC and I'm still getting "Cannot find login information. Not logged in?" when I try and enter from http://mailsc.spamcop.net//reportheld?action=heldlog -- Bob http://www.kanyak.com From NowhereMan at nowhereland.com Sat Mar 28 06:20:02 2009 From: NowhereMan at nowhereland.com (NowhereMan) Date: Sat Apr 25 08:42:48 2009 Subject: [SpamCop-List] SpamCop Can't Parse RIPE IP Address 62.60.136.28 Message-ID: http://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z2738121244z81116a854a69638e015530fc695add08z When performing a DNS lookup with UltraDNS % Note: This output has been filtered. % To receive output for a database update, use the "-B" flag. ------- DNSStuff initially shows WHOIS - 62.60.136.28 mail iconEmail link to results Generated by www.DNSstuff.com Location: Iran (high) [City: Tabriz, Azarbayjan-E Bakhtari] ARIN says that this IP belongs to RIPE; I'm looking it up there. Using 10 day old cached answer (or, you can get fresh results). Hiding E-mail address (you can get results with the E-mail address). % This is the RIPE Whois query server #3. % The objects are in RPSL format. % % Rights restricted by copyright. % See http://www.ripe.net/db/copyright.html %ERROR:203: address passing not allowed for 70.86.70.34 % % Sorry, you are not allowed to pass addresses on the query line . % Please contact us for such permission. For the moment, continuing % this will cause permanent denial of access. [The following lines added by www.dnsstuff.com per requirement by RIPE] This service is subject to the terms and conditions stated in the RIPE NCC Database Copyright Notice. Contact dnsstuff.com's 'info2@' address to report problems regarding the functionality of the service From anthony.edwards at uk.easynet.net Sat Mar 28 09:05:02 2009 From: anthony.edwards at uk.easynet.net (Anthony Edwards) Date: Sat Apr 25 08:44:30 2009 Subject: [SpamCop-List] Re: SpamCop Can't Parse RIPE IP Address 62.60.136.28 References: Message-ID: On Sat, 28 Mar 2009 00:18:34 -0500, NowhereMan wrote: > > http://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z2738121244z81116a854a69638e015530fc695add08z > > When performing a DNS lookup with UltraDNS > > % Note: This output has been filtered. > % To receive output for a database update, use the "-B" flag. > > ------- > DNSStuff initially shows > > WHOIS - 62.60.136.28 > mail iconEmail link to results > Generated by www.DNSstuff.com > > Location: Iran (high) [City: Tabriz, Azarbayjan-E Bakhtari] > > ARIN says that this IP belongs to RIPE; I'm looking it up there. abuse@abuse:~$ whois -h whois.ripe.net -B 62.60.136.28 % This is the RIPE Whois query server #3. % The objects are in RPSL format. % % Rights restricted by copyright. % See http://www.ripe.net/db/copyright.html % Information related to '62.60.136.0 - 62.60.136.255' inetnum: 62.60.136.0 - 62.60.136.255 netname: IRANSCIENCE-IDC descr: Iranscience network Data Center & Storage Network country: IR admin-c: SR3604-RIPE tech-c: SR3604-RIPE status: ASSIGNED PA mnt-by: IROST-MNT mnt-lower: IROST-MNT mnt-routes: IROST-MNT changed: ipdomain@irost.com 20070721 source: RIPE person: Sohrab Rahbar address: Iranian Research Organisation for Science,Technology address: No.71- Forsat Ave.Enghelab Street address: Tehran, Iran phone: +98 21 88834352 fax-no: +98 21 88826627 nic-hdl: SR3604-RIPE changed: ipdomain@irost.com 20060819 source: RIPE % Information related to '62.60.128.0/18AS15611' route: 62.60.128.0/18 descr: IROST-route origin: AS15611 mnt-by: IROST-MNT changed: ipdomain@irost.net 20020202 changed: chizari@irost.com 20030122 source: RIPE > Using 10 day old cached answer (or, you can get fresh results). > Hiding E-mail address (you can get results with the E-mail address). > > % This is the RIPE Whois query server #3. > % The objects are in RPSL format. > % > % Rights restricted by copyright. > % See http://www.ripe.net/db/copyright.html > > %ERROR:203: address passing not allowed for 70.86.70.34 > % > % Sorry, you are not allowed to pass addresses on the query line . > % Please contact us for such permission. For the moment, continuing > % this will cause permanent denial of access. > [The following lines added by www.dnsstuff.com per requirement by RIPE] > This service is subject to the terms and conditions stated in the RIPE NCC Database Copyright Notice. > Contact dnsstuff.com's 'info2@' address to report problems regarding the functionality of the service Presumably 70.86.70.34 is part of the dnsstuff.com infrastructure? It appears that RIPE may be limiting query functionality from that IP address for some reason (a perceived excessive volume of queries, perhaps?). -- Anthony Edwards * anthony.edwards@uk.easynet.net Abuse Team Manager * Tel: 020 7900 4444 Easynet Ltd * DDI: 0161 888 3507 http://www.easynet.com * Fax: 0845 333 4503 From nobody at spamcop.net Sat Mar 28 14:50:02 2009 From: nobody at spamcop.net (Ellen) Date: Sat Apr 25 08:48:13 2009 Subject: [SpamCop-List] Outlook - forward as attachment Message-ID: If anyone is using Outlook and forward as attachment to submit spam to SC for parsing I would appreciate it if you would either write to me at deputies @ admin.spamcop.net or reply here. I have a user with an odd problem and as I don't use Outlook I am a little stymied figuring out how to proceed. Posted to spamcop and geeks with follow-ups to geeks Thanks! Ellen Bah not posted to geeks cause I was just informed I can't post to geeks so I wonder what that's all about From nobody at spamcop.net Sat Mar 28 14:50:02 2009 From: nobody at spamcop.net (bar0) Date: Sat Apr 25 08:48:21 2009 Subject: [SpamCop-List] Re: Outlook - forward as attachment References: Message-ID: "Ellen" wrote in message news:gql9m5$9lo$2@news.spamcop.net... > If anyone is using Outlook and forward as attachment to submit spam to > SC for parsing I would appreciate it if you would either write to me at > deputies @ admin.spamcop.net or reply here. I have a user with an > odd problem and as I don't use Outlook I am a little stymied figuring > out how to proceed. I didn't know that was possible without unsupported add-ons or plugins, unless we're talking about Outlook _Express_. From MikeE at ster.invalid Sat Mar 28 16:30:01 2009 From: MikeE at ster.invalid (Mike Easter) Date: Sat Apr 25 08:49:32 2009 Subject: [SpamCop-List] Re: Outlook - forward as attachment References: Message-ID: bar0 wrote: > "Ellen" >> If anyone is using Outlook and forward as attachment to submit spam to >> SC for parsing I would appreciate it if you would either write to me at >> deputies @ admin.spamcop.net or reply here. I have a user with an >> odd problem and as I don't use Outlook I am a little stymied figuring >> out how to proceed. > > I didn't know that was possible without unsupported add-ons or plugins, > unless we're talking about Outlook _Express_. I don't know if you include a VBA macro as an add-on or plug-in, but there was a recent thread in .mail initiated by Erik Ch. Ohrnberger about his OL macro. news://news.spamcop.net/gqau05$qmh$2@news.spamcop.net Subject: SpamCop reporting issues Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 11:24:53 -0400 He got his problem worked out -- it wasn't his macro but his provider wow obstructing SC submissions. He now emails submits thru' gmail. -- Mike Easter kibitzer, not SC admin From nobody at spamcop.net Sat Mar 28 17:45:01 2009 From: nobody at spamcop.net (bar0) Date: Sat Apr 25 08:50:21 2009 Subject: [SpamCop-List] Re: Outlook - forward as attachment References: <0eiss4tm1d8mavtb64uc265jte4pe3pknj@4ax.com> Message-ID: "SpamCop Admin" wrote in message news:0eiss4tm1d8mavtb64uc265jte4pe3pknj@4ax.com... > Just so there is no confusion... > > We understand that later versions of Microsoft Outlook feature a > "Forward as Attachment" function just like Outlook Express. Yes, it (they?) do(es) in OL 2003, however, it sends a bowdlerized version of the email, with only the usual "display" or visible headers, not the headers you'd see under the options menu. ie not the "full" headers, but rather the From, Subject, CC, and Date, lines and perhaps some other lines selectable by some customization. Something similar to what you'd get from Eudora Forward, or Yahoo Forward (unless you hold down the key). From bcs1 at spamcop.net Sat Mar 28 18:20:01 2009 From: bcs1 at spamcop.net (Bill) Date: Sat Apr 25 08:50:56 2009 Subject: [SpamCop-List] spam in .social??? Message-ID: here's the information from clicking reply to group. "ecm2001 rapidshare download torrent " wrote in message news:gqk5vo$8rr$8@news.spamcop.net... > We can crack or emulate any protection type: Dongle, > Hardlock, Hasp, Serial, Password, Hasp4, Flexlm, Sentinel, > Wibu, Eutron Smartkey, Hasphl, Proteq, All the Protections!! Bill From bcs1 at spamcop.net Sat Mar 28 18:20:01 2009 From: bcs1 at spamcop.net (Bill) Date: Sat Apr 25 08:50:58 2009 Subject: [SpamCop-List] Re: spam in .social??? References: Message-ID: "Bill" wrote in message news:gqllvt$e0p$1@news.spamcop.net... > here's the information from clicking reply to group. > > > "ecm2001 rapidshare download torrent " > wrote in message > news:gqk5vo$8rr$8@news.spamcop.net... >> We can crack or emulate any protection type: Dongle, >> Hardlock, Hasp, Serial, Password, Hasp4, Flexlm, Sentinel, >> Wibu, Eutron Smartkey, Hasphl, Proteq, All the Protections!! > > > Bill > > > oh, it's in here too ecm2001 crack torrent rapidshare download 57400710144836480355 Bill From nobody at spamcop.net Sat Mar 28 22:35:01 2009 From: nobody at spamcop.net (Steven Underwood) Date: Sat Apr 25 08:53:42 2009 Subject: [SpamCop-List] Re: Outlook - forward as attachment References: Message-ID: "Ellen" wrote in message news:gql9m5$9lo$2@news.spamcop.net... > If anyone is using Outlook and forward as attachment to submit spam to > SC for parsing I would appreciate it if you would either write to me at > deputies @ admin.spamcop.net or reply here. I have a user with an > odd problem and as I don't use Outlook I am a little stymied figuring > out how to proceed. > > Posted to spamcop and geeks with follow-ups to geeks > > > Thanks! > > > Ellen > > Bah not posted to geeks cause I was just informed I can't post to geeks so > I wonder what that's all about > Replied in email with my account information. I use the functionality, without any add-ons with Outlook 2003 at work. To easily forward as attachment, I have a blank message in my reporting folder so I can always select at least 2 messages to forward which then defaults to the Forward as Attachment mode. P.S. Just realized my reply address in that email may be the invalid one I use here... the login email address is no longer valid for replies, but the "Email address where would you like to receive email responses from your reports?" is. From nobody at spamcop.net Sat Mar 28 22:45:01 2009 From: nobody at spamcop.net (Steven Underwood) Date: Sat Apr 25 08:53:55 2009 Subject: [SpamCop-List] Re: spam in .social??? References: Message-ID: "Bill" wrote in message news:gqlm55$e8r$1@news.spamcop.net... > > "Bill" wrote in message > news:gqllvt$e0p$1@news.spamcop.net... >> here's the information from clicking reply to group. >> >> >> "ecm2001 rapidshare download torrent " >> wrote in message >> news:gqk5vo$8rr$8@news.spamcop.net... >>> We can crack or emulate any protection type: Dongle, >>> Hardlock, Hasp, Serial, Password, Hasp4, Flexlm, Sentinel, >>> Wibu, Eutron Smartkey, Hasphl, Proteq, All the Protections!! >> >> >> Bill >> >> >> > > oh, it's in here too > > ecm2001 crack torrent rapidshare download 57400710144836480355 > > > Bill > > Full headers show: Path: news.spamcop.net!not-for-mail From: "ecm2001 rapidshare download torrent " Newsgroups: spamcop Subject: ecm2001 crack torrent rapidshare download 57400710144836480355 Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 00:35:23 -0300 Organization: ecm2001 download rapidshare torrent Lines: 43 Sender: ecm2001 rapidshare download torrent Message-ID: Reply-To: ecm2001.download@xxxx54545.rapidshare.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 201.79.6.39 X-Trace: news.spamcop.net 1238211381 9083 201.79.6.39 (28 Mar 2009 03:36:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: news@news.spamcop.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 03:36:21 +0000 (UTC) X-Priority: 3 X-Library: Indy 9.00.10 Xref: news.spamcop.net spamcop:171253 From gezgin at spamcop.net.which.is.not.invalid Sun Mar 29 04:55:01 2009 From: gezgin at spamcop.net.which.is.not.invalid (Opinicus) Date: Sat Apr 25 08:55:52 2009 Subject: [SpamCop-List] Re: All Fixed?? References: <823ss4dkddfmgnp0l1afp41dg6paue6ivp@4ax.com> Message-ID: "SpamCop Admin" wrote > Opinicus wrote: >>-It's 04:40 UTC and I'm still getting "Cannot find login information. Not >>-logged in?" when I try and enter from >>-http://mailsc.spamcop.net/reportheld?action=heldlog > I'm seeing the same thing when I'm logged into mailsc and try to get > to Held Mail. > I'll file a bug to get that fixed. It's now 29 March 2009 @ 04:51 GMT and I'm still getting "Cannot find login information. Not logged in?" when I try and enter from http://mailsc.spamcop.net/reportheld?action=heldlog. What is the ETA on this bug-squashing? -- Bob http://www.kanyak.com From iwantsex at 0.7673872nowathome.com Sun Mar 29 15:20:02 2009 From: iwantsex at 0.7673872nowathome.com (iwantsex@0.7673872nowathome.com) Date: Sat Apr 25 09:00:23 2009 Subject: [SpamCop-List] 0.3334977 I Have To See This ...0.6432563 Message-ID: 0.7139805 I Have To See This ... 0.7673872 0.3334977 Now Visit http://www.clicklinknow.com/dating/ 0.6432563 From nobody at spamcop.net Sun Mar 29 16:10:02 2009 From: nobody at spamcop.net (bar0) Date: Sat Apr 25 09:00:50 2009 Subject: [SpamCop-List] Re: All Fixed?? References: <823ss4dkddfmgnp0l1afp41dg6paue6ivp@4ax.com> Message-ID: "Opinicus" wrote in message news:gqmrcs$ok2$1@news.spamcop.net... ... > > It's now 29 March 2009 @ 04:51 GMT and I'm still getting "Cannot find > login information. Not logged in?" when I try and enter from > http://mailsc.spamcop.net/reportheld?action=heldlog. > > What is the ETA on this bug-squashing? and I'm still seeing stretches of the cannot parse header on C&P submissions From nobody at spamcop.net Sun Mar 29 18:35:02 2009 From: nobody at spamcop.net (Steven Underwood) Date: Sat Apr 25 09:01:11 2009 Subject: [SpamCop-List] Re: All Fixed?? References: <823ss4dkddfmgnp0l1afp41dg6paue6ivp@4ax.com> Message-ID: "Flatus Ohlfahrt" wrote in message news:Xns9BDD76903BC2flatusohlfahrtsorg@216.154.195.61... > It really is frustrating not having mention of this problem in > the 'News' section of the site--more frustrating than the > problem itself. To be fair, the "News" section you speak of is on the Email site and that site is not having any issues. The reporting side of operations (it is 2 separate companies) is having the issue connecting to the mail storage area. That being said, I have asked for an announcement to be made... not sure if it will be or if it will even be seen before the issue is solved.. From bcs1 at spamcop.net Sun Mar 29 18:55:01 2009 From: bcs1 at spamcop.net (Bill) Date: Sat Apr 25 09:01:32 2009 Subject: [SpamCop-List] Re: spam in .social??? References: Message-ID: "Steven Underwood" wrote in message news:gqm5fv$vbv$1@news.spamcop.net... > Full headers show: > Path: news.spamcop.net!not-for-mail > From: "ecm2001 rapidshare download torrent " > > Newsgroups: spamcop > Subject: ecm2001 crack torrent rapidshare download 57400710144836480355 > Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 00:35:23 -0300 > Organization: ecm2001 download rapidshare torrent > Lines: 43 > Sender: ecm2001 rapidshare download torrent > > Message-ID: > Reply-To: ecm2001.download@xxxx54545.rapidshare.com > NNTP-Posting-Host: 201.79.6.39 > X-Trace: news.spamcop.net 1238211381 9083 201.79.6.39 (28 Mar 2009 > 03:36:21 GMT) > X-Complaints-To: news@news.spamcop.net > NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 03:36:21 +0000 (UTC) > X-Priority: 3 > X-Library: Indy 9.00.10 > Xref: news.spamcop.net spamcop:171253 > > well Steven, we got another... Bill Path: news.spamcop.net!not-for-mail From: iwantsex@0.7673872nowathome.com Newsgroups: spamcop Subject: 0.3334977 I Have To See This ...0.6432563 Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 14:19:50 +0000 (UTC) Organization: SpamCop Lines: 4 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.188.113.235 X-Trace: news.spamcop.net 1238336390 27783 71.188.113.235 (29 Mar 2009 14:19:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: news@news.spamcop.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 14:19:50 +0000 (UTC) Body: Xref: news.spamcop.net spamcop:171268 0.7139805 I Have To See This ... 0.7673872 0.3334977 Now Visit http://www.clicklinknow.com/dating/ 0.6432563 From nobody at spamcop.net Sun Mar 29 19:40:01 2009 From: nobody at spamcop.net (bar0) Date: Sat Apr 25 09:01:40 2009 Subject: [SpamCop-List] Re: spam in .social??? References: Message-ID: "Bill" wrote in message news:gqoccu$2gh$1@news.spamcop.net... >... > > well Steven, > we got another... > > Bill > > > Path: news.spamcop.net!not-for-mail.... ....and we really didn't need any parts of it again! From iwantsex at 0.5258269nowathome.com Sun Mar 29 20:15:02 2009 From: iwantsex at 0.5258269nowathome.com (iwantsex@0.5258269nowathome.com) Date: Sat Apr 25 09:01:58 2009 Subject: [SpamCop-List] 0.9210362 I Feel Curious ... 0.4271039 Message-ID: 0.6433216 I Feel Curious... 0.5258269 0.9210362 Now Visit http://www.clicklinknow.com/dating/ 0.4271039 From iwantsex at 0.4928334nowathome.com Sun Mar 29 20:20:02 2009 From: iwantsex at 0.4928334nowathome.com (iwantsex@0.4928334nowathome.com) Date: Sat Apr 25 09:02:13 2009 Subject: [SpamCop-List] 0.3499309 Now Click Here To Have It ... 0.6850973 Message-ID: 0.4140189 Now Click Here To Have It ... 0.4928334 0.3499309 Now Visit http://www.clicklinknow.com/dating/ 0.6850973 From iwantsex at 0.3809559nowathome.com Sun Mar 29 20:20:02 2009 From: iwantsex at 0.3809559nowathome.com (iwantsex@0.3809559nowathome.com) Date: Sat Apr 25 09:02:16 2009 Subject: [SpamCop-List] 0.2380535 Got To See This ... 0.5732199 Message-ID: 0.3021415 Got To See This ... 0.3809559 0.2380535 Now Visit http://www.clicklinknow.com/dating/ 0.5732199 From iwantsex at 0.2032106nowathome.com Sun Mar 29 21:00:01 2009 From: iwantsex at 0.2032106nowathome.com (iwantsex@0.2032106nowathome.com) Date: Sat Apr 25 09:02:32 2009 Subject: [SpamCop-List] 0.4021108 See The Pleasure Inside ... 0.344659 Message-ID: 0.7825935 See The Pleasure Inside ... 0.2032106 0.4021108 Now Visit http://www.clicklinknow.com/dating/ 0.344659 From iwantsex at 0.8303449nowathome.com Sun Mar 29 21:10:02 2009 From: iwantsex at 0.8303449nowathome.com (iwantsex@0.8303449nowathome.com) Date: Sat Apr 25 09:02:40 2009 Subject: [SpamCop-List] 0.3964555 Now Click Here To See ... 0.7062141 Message-ID: 0.7769383 Now Click Here To See ... 0.8303449 0.3964555 Now Visit http://www.clicklinknow.com/dating/ 0.7062141 From nobody at devnull.spamcop.net Sun Mar 29 21:40:01 2009 From: nobody at devnull.spamcop.net (Wazoo) Date: Sat Apr 25 09:03:08 2009 Subject: [SpamCop-List] Re: All Fixed?? References: <823ss4dkddfmgnp0l1afp41dg6paue6ivp@4ax.com> Message-ID: "Flatus Ohlfahrt" wrote in message news:Xns9BDD76903BC2flatusohlfahrtsorg@216.154.195.61... > On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 15:07:20 GMT, bar0 wrote in > news:gqo2rb$49u$1@news.spamcop.net: >> "Opinicus" wrote >> in message news:gqmrcs$ok2$1@news.spamcop.net... >> ... >>> It's now 29 March 2009 @ 04:51 GMT and I'm still getting >>> "Cannot find login information. Not logged in?" when I try >>> and enter from >>> http://mailsc.spamcop.net/reportheld?action=heldlog. > > "Cannot find login information. Not logged in?" > > It really is frustrating not having mention of this problem in > the 'News' section of the site--more frustrating than the > problem itself. And for the flip side .... the mailsc address invoked states that a SpamCop/CESmail.net account is in use. As support for those e-mail accounts was suggested to be handled over in the Forum, one would note that there are numerous Topics/Discussion existing on various issues, functions, and services impacted by this upgrade. I have made an attempt to co-locate some/most of this data into a single spot in the Announcements section of the Forum. http://forum.spamcop.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=10210 From asterix at no_where.net Sun Mar 29 22:40:01 2009 From: asterix at no_where.net (Asterix) Date: Sat Apr 25 09:03:22 2009 Subject: [SpamCop-List] Re: spam in .social??? References: Message-ID: <1ixd5pw.1yo6jg1aq9gp8N%asterix@no_where.net> bar0 wrote: > "Bill" wrote in message > news:gqoccu$2gh$1@news.spamcop.net... > >... > > > > well Steven, > > we got another... > > > > Bill > > > > > > Path: news.spamcop.net!not-for-mail.... > > ....and we really didn't need any parts of it again! Guess somebody with a spamcop account got their Wintel box trojaned - again. Can you track the account and warn the poor sod? -- I recommend Macs to my friends, and Windows machines to those whom I don't mind billing by the hour From nobody at spamcop.net Sun Mar 29 22:55:02 2009 From: nobody at spamcop.net (bar0) Date: Sat Apr 25 09:03:26 2009 Subject: [SpamCop-List] Re: spam in .social??? References: <1ixd5pw.1yo6jg1aq9gp8N%asterix@no_where.net> Message-ID: "Asterix" wrote in message news:1ixd5pw.1yo6jg1aq9gp8N%asterix@no_where.net... > bar0 wrote: > >> "Bill" wrote in message >> news:gqoccu$2gh$1@news.spamcop.net... >> >... >> > >> > well Steven, >> > we got another... >> > >> > Bill >> > >> > >> > Path: news.spamcop.net!not-for-mail.... >> >> ....and we really didn't need any parts of it again! > > Guess somebody with a spamcop account got their Wintel box trojaned - > again. Can you track the account and warn the poor sod? I think anyone with a newsreader can access these NG's, AFAIK there are no accounts. I've never used my SC account anywhere in setting OE up to read news here. I think it's a disgruntled spam-er-emailer with a new kit and affiliate ID for adultspamming.com From MikeE at ster.invalid Sun Mar 29 23:10:01 2009 From: MikeE at ster.invalid (Mike Easter) Date: Sat Apr 25 09:03:27 2009 Subject: [SpamCop-List] Re: spam in .social??? References: <1ixd5pw.1yo6jg1aq9gp8N%asterix@no_where.net> Message-ID: Asterix wrote: > Guess somebody with a spamcop account got their Wintel box trojaned - > again. Can you track the account and warn the poor sod? You don't need an account to spam these groups. All you need is the name of the newsserver which is public information, ie published on the web. I recommend that they be ignored, which is more efficient than filtering. As we used to say, "Jus' ig' 'im!" -- Mike Easter kibitzer, not SC admin From Ag2000CO at Starband.net Sun Mar 29 23:15:01 2009 From: Ag2000CO at Starband.net (LKing) Date: Sat Apr 25 09:03:36 2009 Subject: [SpamCop-List] Re: spam in .social??? In-Reply-To: References: <1ixd5pw.1yo6jg1aq9gp8N%asterix@no_where.net> Message-ID: bar0 wrote, On 3/29/2009 5:54 PM: > "Asterix" wrote in message > news:1ixd5pw.1yo6jg1aq9gp8N%asterix@no_where.net... >> bar0 wrote: >> >>> "Bill" wrote in message >>> news:gqoccu$2gh$1@news.spamcop.net... >>>> ... >>>> >>>> well Steven, >>>> we got another... >>>> >>>> Bill >>>> >>>> >>>> Path: news.spamcop.net!not-for-mail.... >>> ....and we really didn't need any parts of it again! >> Guess somebody with a spamcop account got their Wintel box trojaned - >> again. Can you track the account and warn the poor sod? > > I think anyone with a newsreader can access these NG's, AFAIK there are no > accounts. I've never used my SC account anywhere in setting OE up to read > news here. I think it's a disgruntled spam-er-emailer with a new kit and > affiliate ID for adultspamming.com > > Daniel Frascella Jr Daniel Frascella Jr (nowclickhere@yahoo.com) +1.6095109813 Fax: 38 Division Street Trenton, NJ 08611 US is the name I get from whois From anthony.edwards at uk.easynet.net Mon Mar 30 00:15:01 2009 From: anthony.edwards at uk.easynet.net (Anthony Edwards) Date: Sat Apr 25 09:03:44 2009 Subject: [SpamCop-List] Re: Outlook - forward as attachment References: <0eiss4tm1d8mavtb64uc265jte4pe3pknj@4ax.com> Message-ID: On Sat, 28 Mar 2009 10:05:37 -0600, SpamCop Admin wrote: > Just so there is no confusion... > > We understand that later versions of Microsoft Outlook feature a > "Forward as Attachment" function just like Outlook Express. This was possible using Outlook 97 also, although it wasn't called that. One had to first create a new email message then attach the email to be forwarded to it, which would then be sent as a message/rfc822 attachment. It couldn't be done in Outlook 97 by forwarding an email in the usual way. -- Anthony Edwards * anthony.edwards@uk.easynet.net Abuse Team Manager * Tel: 020 7900 4444 Easynet Ltd * DDI: 0161 888 3507 http://www.easynet.com * Fax: 0845 333 4503 From bcs1 at spamcop.net Mon Mar 30 01:35:02 2009 From: bcs1 at spamcop.net (Bill) Date: Sat Apr 25 09:04:00 2009 Subject: [SpamCop-List] Re: spam in .social??? References: Message-ID: "bar0" wrote in message news:gqof47$csv$1@news.spamcop.net... > > "Bill" wrote in message > news:gqoccu$2gh$1@news.spamcop.net... >>... >> >> well Steven, >> we got another... >> >> Bill >> >> >> Path: news.spamcop.net!not-for-mail.... > > ....and we really didn't need any parts of it again! > There's like 6 or 7 of them all different now... From nobody at spamcop.net Mon Mar 30 02:45:01 2009 From: nobody at spamcop.net (bar0) Date: Sat Apr 25 09:04:27 2009 Subject: [SpamCop-List] Re: Outlook - forward as attachment References: <0eiss4tm1d8mavtb64uc265jte4pe3pknj@4ax.com> Message-ID: "Anthony Edwards" wrote in message news:gqovau$pbl$1@news.spamcop.net... > On Sat, 28 Mar 2009 10:05:37 -0600, SpamCop Admin > > wrote: >> Just so there is no confusion... >> >> We understand that later versions of Microsoft Outlook feature a >> "Forward as Attachment" function just like Outlook Express. > > This was possible using Outlook 97 also, although it wasn't called > that. One had to first create a new email message then attach > the email to be forwarded to it, which would then be sent as a > message/rfc822 attachment. > > It couldn't be done in Outlook 97 by forwarding an email in the > usual way. wierd, my wetlook only gives me a bowdlerized attachment with insuffucuent headers. OTOH, OE does it fine. From nobody at devnull.spamcop.net Mon Mar 30 04:15:02 2009 From: nobody at devnull.spamcop.net (Patto) Date: Sat Apr 25 09:04:59 2009 Subject: [SpamCop-List] Re: Strange going-ons... In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: It is Monday morning, and it is still doing it, but far less frequently now (once for the entire weekend spam). Patto wrote: > I send a group of spam messages to SC, receive a confirmation "has > received x emails", then proceed to http://www.spamcop.net/ > > I click on the 'Report Now' link, and SC brings up, e.g. > http://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z2734993992zda2bce77d70854a4b359bfcd7876a0d2z > > I click on 'Send Spam Report(s) Now', and the thing seems to be gone. > The 'Report Now' link comes back, but interestingly its color is of a > link already visited. When I click on it, the same spam as above comes > back, but as 'already sent'. > > This seems to report itself with every second submission. This behavior > is new as per today. From nobody at devnull.spamcop.net Mon Mar 30 04:25:02 2009 From: nobody at devnull.spamcop.net (Patto) Date: Sat Apr 25 09:05:07 2009 Subject: [SpamCop-List] Re: 0.3964555 Now Click Here To See ... 0.7062141 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: iwantsex@0.8303449nowathome.com wrote: > 0.7769383 Now Click Here To See ... 0.8303449 > > 0.3964555 Now Visit /* removed */ 0.7062141 Obviously it is not a problem to spam the SpamCop newsgroup, as as usenet spam can no longer be reported to SC! From MikeE at ster.invalid Mon Mar 30 04:55:01 2009 From: MikeE at ster.invalid (Mike Easter) Date: Sat Apr 25 09:05:13 2009 Subject: [SpamCop-List] Re: 0.3964555 Now Click Here To See ... 0.7062141 References: Message-ID: Patto wrote: > iwantsex@0.8303449nowathome.com wrote: >> 0.7769383 Now Click Here To See ... 0.8303449 > Obviously it is not a problem to spam the SpamCop newsgroup, as as > usenet spam can no longer be reported to SC! Managing spam in newsgroups requires a lot of administration - heavy-handed administering of spamcop's newsgroups is not in the cards. Huge and hugely profitable and expensively administered newsservers such as giganews don't really manage spam competently; and it would be impractical for a simple little news place like spamcop's to even attempt to do so. Even if the newsserver was to go to the trouble to authenticate for spamcop registrants, signup for spamcop is both free and trivial. Not only that, but in the past, some news misbehaviors were generated by regulars/reporters. Separate from the complicated business of such as cleanfeed and antispam cancelbots and active/intense administration such as is done on the server end by indvidual.net, the best thing for the reader to do about news spam on the client end is to ignore it. If you can't ignore it, get a newsreader filter to ignore it for you. The more noise that is made about it, the more 'unsettling' such a minor issue will seem to be. -- Mike Easter kibitzer, not SC admin From anthony.edwards at uk.easynet.net Mon Mar 30 13:40:02 2009 From: anthony.edwards at uk.easynet.net (Anthony Edwards) Date: Sat Apr 25 09:09:36 2009 Subject: [SpamCop-List] Re: Outlook - forward as attachment References: <0eiss4tm1d8mavtb64uc265jte4pe3pknj@4ax.com> Message-ID: On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 20:44:13 -0500, bar0 wrote: > > "Anthony Edwards" wrote in message > news:gqovau$pbl$1@news.spamcop.net... >> On Sat, 28 Mar 2009 10:05:37 -0600, SpamCop Admin >> >> wrote: >>> Just so there is no confusion... >>> >>> We understand that later versions of Microsoft Outlook feature a >>> "Forward as Attachment" function just like Outlook Express. >> >> This was possible using Outlook 97 also, although it wasn't called >> that. One had to first create a new email message then attach >> the email to be forwarded to it, which would then be sent as a >> message/rfc822 attachment. >> >> It couldn't be done in Outlook 97 by forwarding an email in the >> usual way. > > wierd, my wetlook only gives me a bowdlerized attachment with insuffucuent > headers. OTOH, OE does it fine. Outlook can only forward as an attachment the email that it has, in some Exchange Server environments only a small subset of SMTP header information is made available to local user recipients (the default configuration of recent Exchange Server versions, as I understand things). Are you in an Exchange Server environment yourself? Kind regards Anthony Edwards -- Anthony Edwards * anthony.edwards@uk.easynet.net Abuse Team Manager * Tel: 020 7900 4444 Easynet Ltd * DDI: 0161 888 3507 http://www.easynet.com * Fax: 0845 333 4503 From nobody at no.no Mon Mar 30 15:10:01 2009 From: nobody at no.no (helge) Date: Sat Apr 25 09:11:01 2009 Subject: [SpamCop-List] Still no fix (was: Re: All Fixed??) In-Reply-To: References: <823ss4dkddfmgnp0l1afp41dg6paue6ivp@4ax.com> Message-ID: Flatus Ohlfahrt skrev: > On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 15:07:20 GMT, bar0 wrote in > news:gqo2rb$49u$1@news.spamcop.net: > >> "Opinicus" wrote >> in message news:gqmrcs$ok2$1@news.spamcop.net... >> ... >>> It's now 29 March 2009 @ 04:51 GMT and I'm still getting >>> "Cannot find login information. Not logged in?" when I try >>> and enter from >>> http://mailsc.spamcop.net/reportheld?action=heldlog. >>> >>> What is the ETA on this bug-squashing? >> >> and I'm still seeing stretches of the cannot parse header >> on C&P submissions >> >> > > "Cannot find login information. Not logged in?" snip I still see that after I have logged in from the webmail held mail page to http://mailsc.spamcop.net/ and then use the held mail button. Usually I am able to use the cookie login. Time 1600 UTC+2 helge From nobody at spamcop.net Mon Mar 30 16:35:02 2009 From: nobody at spamcop.net (Bar0) Date: Sat Apr 25 09:11:37 2009 Subject: [SpamCop-List] Re: Outlook - forward as attachment References: <0eiss4tm1d8mavtb64uc265jte4pe3pknj@4ax.com> Message-ID: "Anthony Edwards" wrote in message news:gqqecr$oog$1@news.spamcop.net... > On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 20:44:13 -0500, bar0 wrote: >> >> "Anthony Edwards" wrote in message >> news:gqovau$pbl$1@news.spamcop.net... >>> On Sat, 28 Mar 2009 10:05:37 -0600, SpamCop Admin >>> >>> wrote: ... >> >> wierd, my wetlook only gives me a bowdlerized attachment with >> insuffucuent >> headers. OTOH, OE does it fine. > > Outlook can only forward as an attachment the email that it has, in > some Exchange Server environments only a small subset of SMTP header > information is made available to local user recipients (the default > configuration of recent Exchange Server versions, as I understand > things). > > Are you in an Exchange Server environment yourself? No, Not yet, that is coming. I am still POPing mail, and I just tried again, and all I get are the "user" headers, no received lines. I created a new mail and dragged the spam item into the body area, which caused the creation of an eml attachment. which is the bowdlerized item. Just to be sure I submitted it to SC, and got the classic can't find your spam in the message. Scrooling down SC's reply to the message that SC got, I see it began with the "From" line, no "Received" lines. From asterix at no_where.net Mon Mar 30 19:10:01 2009 From: asterix at no_where.net (Asterix) Date: Sat Apr 25 09:12:50 2009 Subject: [SpamCop-List] Re: spam in .social??? References: <1ixd5pw.1yo6jg1aq9gp8N%asterix@no_where.net> Message-ID: <1ixeqsr.17w6ujq18qwzd0N%asterix@no_where.net> bar0 wrote: > > Guess somebody with a spamcop account got their Wintel box trojaned - > > again. Can you track the account and warn the poor sod? > > I think anyone with a newsreader can access these NG's, AFAIK there are no > accounts. I've never used my SC account anywhere in setting OE up to read > news here. Your right - I haven't checked my settings for many years, so I forgot about that... -- I recommend Macs to my friends, and Windows machines to those whom I don't mind billing by the hour From nobody at spamcop.net Mon Mar 30 20:45:01 2009 From: nobody at spamcop.net (Antispam Knight) Date: Sat Apr 25 09:13:20 2009 Subject: [SpamCop-List] blizzardhosting.net[216.17.107.72] Message-ID: Are others seeing deliberately borken spams pimping these clowns? I'm seeing about 3-4/day. Hosted by phatservers.net and owned by marqueemediaonline.com. AK From nobody at spamcop.net Mon Mar 30 21:00:02 2009 From: nobody at spamcop.net (Ellen) Date: Sat Apr 25 09:13:26 2009 Subject: [SpamCop-List] Hotpatch Maintenance Monday March 30 Message-ID: Subject: SpamCop 4.5.0-101 Hot Patch Deployment Date/Time of Maintenance: Monday, March 30, 2009, 2:00pm PDT Expected Duration: 1 hours Impact: Our SpamCop cluster will have intermittent availability during the 1 hour window. Customer Impact: Direct customers of our SpamCop service will notice intermittent connectivity during the downtime. This hotpatch addresses the mailsc/held mail/etc errors of the last couple of days. Please propagate as needed. Ellen SpamCop From nobody at spamcop.net Mon Mar 30 21:05:02 2009 From: nobody at spamcop.net (Ellen) Date: Sat Apr 25 09:13:30 2009 Subject: [SpamCop-List] Hotpatch Maintenance Monday March 30 Message-ID: Subject: SpamCop 4.5.0-101 Hot Patch Deployment Date/Time of Maintenance: Monday, March 30, 2009, 2:00pm PDT Expected Duration: 1 hours Impact: Our SpamCop cluster will have intermittent availability during the 1 hour window. Customer Impact: Direct customers of our SpamCop service will notice intermittent connectivity during the downtime. This hotpatch addresses the mailsc/held mail/etc errors of the last couple of days. Please propagate as needed. Ellen SpamCop From nobody at spamcop.net Mon Mar 30 23:10:11 2009 From: nobody at spamcop.net (Steven Underwood) Date: Sat Apr 25 09:14:28 2009 Subject: [SpamCop-List] Re: Hotpatch Maintenance Monday March 30 References: Message-ID: "Ellen" wrote in message news:gqr8j8$6b1$2@news.spamcop.net... > > This hotpatch addresses the mailsc/held mail/etc errors of the last > couple of days. > > Ellen > SpamCop This appears to be working from my location... thank you for the work to get this completed. From nobody at spamcop.net Tue Mar 31 01:05:01 2009 From: nobody at spamcop.net (bar0) Date: Sat Apr 25 09:15:23 2009 Subject: [SpamCop-List] Re: blizzardhosting.net[216.17.107.72] References: Message-ID: "Antispam Knight" wrote in message news:gqr7ad$19f$1@news.spamcop.net... > Are others seeing deliberately borken spams pimping these clowns? I'm > seeing about 3-4/day. > Hosted by phatservers.net and owned by marqueemediaonline.com. > AK Haven't seen a spam from Blizzard for years, I concluded that I've been placed on their suppression list, my mail providers block them, or they cleaned up. At one time they sourced a blizzard of spam. Are you sure there isn't a joe by a spammer unhappy at being turfed going on? From nobody at spamcop.net Tue Mar 31 02:25:01 2009 From: nobody at spamcop.net (Antispam Knight) Date: Sat Apr 25 09:16:12 2009 Subject: [SpamCop-List] Re: blizzardhosting.net[216.17.107.72] References: Message-ID: "bar0" wrote in message news:gqrmeg$1dv$1@news.spamcop.net... > > "Antispam Knight" wrote in message > news:gqr7ad$19f$1@news.spamcop.net... >> Are others seeing deliberately borken spams pimping these clowns? I'm >> seeing about 3-4/day. >> Hosted by phatservers.net and owned by marqueemediaonline.com. >> AK > > Haven't seen a spam from Blizzard for years, I concluded that I've been > placed on their suppression list, my mail providers block them, or they > cleaned up. At one time they sourced a blizzard of spam. Are you sure > there isn't a joe by a spammer unhappy at being turfed going on? > No, I don't know that. If you'd care to take a look see http://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z2744889854z0b51d51dfae3c9e67885a1f7ec1c9dffz They're all borken in the same way, and all identical except for the source. AK