[SpamCop-Mail] Re: "Held mail" can't deal with 11000+ spams
povfan at voltar-confed.org
Wed Jan 28 20:13:30 EST 2004
Wow, I guess I don't know what "VER" is ... I thought it was
just a typo last time. I'll hit the faq from here.
In article <bv93rl$b5$1 at news.spamcop.net>, Jeff G. wrote:
> Jettero Heller <povfan at voltar-confed.org> organized electrons in
> article news:slrnc1g1kj.aqg.povfan at corky.voltar-confed.org that
> appeared as follows:
>> In article <bv631n$hfd$2 at news.spamcop.net>, Jeff G. wrote:
>>>> that I need to CLOSE MY BROWSER to switch between mine and my
>>> Alternatively, you could use different manufacturers' browsers to
>>> deal with VER until it goes away.
>> I'm comfortable doing that. I have a working solution anyway.
>> I would really like it if the held mail queue used the same login
>> info as the webmail. But I think you're telling me it will be
>> combined in the relatively near future.
> Webmail currently has the following capabilites designed to duplicate VER
> Action Capability
> ~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~
> Quick - report immediately and trash Report as Spam
> Queue for reporting (and move to trash) Not implemented
> Queue for reporting (do not trash) Not implemented
> Forward (and whitelist sender) Whitelist and Move (or Open and
> Forward (do not whitelist sender) Move (or Open and Redirect)
> Delete Delete
If riding in an airplane is flying, then riding in a boat is swimming.
50 jumps, 15.0 minutes of freefall, 31.3 ff vertical miles.
More information about the SpamCop-Mail