[SpamCop.net - protecting the internet through technology]

[SpamCop-Mail] Re: "Held mail" can't deal with 11000+ spams

Jettero Heller povfan at voltar-confed.org
Wed Jan 28 20:13:30 EST 2004


Wow, I guess I don't know what "VER" is ...  I thought it was
just a typo last time.  I'll hit the faq from here.

In article <bv93rl$b5$1 at news.spamcop.net>, Jeff G. wrote:
> Jettero Heller <povfan at voltar-confed.org> organized electrons in
> article news:slrnc1g1kj.aqg.povfan at corky.voltar-confed.org that
> appeared as follows:
>> In article <bv631n$hfd$2 at news.spamcop.net>, Jeff G. wrote:
>>>> that I need to CLOSE MY BROWSER to switch between mine and my
>>>
>>> Alternatively, you could use different manufacturers' browsers to
>>> deal with VER until it goes away.
>>
>> I'm comfortable doing that.  I have a working solution anyway.
>>
>> I would really like it if the held mail queue used the same login
>> info as the webmail.  But I think you're telling me it will be
>> combined in the relatively near future.
> 
> Webmail currently has the following capabilites designed to duplicate VER
> Actions:
> 
> Action                                   Capability
> ~~~~~~                                   ~~~~~~~~~~
> Quick - report immediately and trash     Report as Spam
> Queue for reporting (and move to trash)  Not implemented
> Queue for reporting (do not trash)       Not implemented
> Forward (and whitelist sender)           Whitelist and Move (or Open and
> Redirect)
> Forward (do not whitelist sender)        Move (or Open and Redirect)
> Delete                                   Delete
> 


-- 
If riding in an airplane is flying, then riding in a boat is swimming.
50 jumps, 15.0 minutes of freefall, 31.3 ff vertical miles.


More information about the SpamCop-Mail mailing list