From jamessalisburyspam at salisbury.org.uk Mon May 1 01:22:24 2006 From: jamessalisburyspam at salisbury.org.uk (James Salisbury) Date: Sun Apr 30 20:48:40 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Mail] Account size Message-ID: Hi, How big is a spamcop webmail account? From shedrivesz at adelphia.net Thu May 4 21:45:10 2006 From: shedrivesz at adelphia.net (Lisa) Date: Thu May 4 20:45:12 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Mail] REMOVE ME Message-ID: <445AA016.2040205@adelphia.net> Please unsubscribe me from your mailing list. Thank you From MikeE at ster.invalid Thu May 4 19:21:53 2006 From: MikeE at ster.invalid (Mike Easter) Date: Thu May 4 21:25:03 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Mail] Re: REMOVE ME References: Message-ID: Lisa wrote: > Please unsubscribe me from your mailing list. Thank you It doesn't work like that. When you subscribe to a mailing list, you have to be able to unsubscribe from the mailing list -- no one can do it for you. Where you subscribed is a mechanism for removing yourself. Every mail item you receive from the mailing list has that information in both the headers of the messages as well as a trailer at the bottom every message. You can click this: mailto:spamcop-mail-request@news.spamcop.net?subject=unsubscribe You can go here http://news.spamcop.net/mailman/listinfo/spamcop-mail and go to the bottom of the page and follow the unsub instructions. -- Mike Easter kibitzer, not SC admin From shedrivesz at adelphia.net Thu May 4 22:35:31 2006 From: shedrivesz at adelphia.net (Lisa) Date: Thu May 4 21:35:33 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Mail] Re: REMOVE ME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <445AABE3.6070007@adelphia.net> Thank you Mike, I just received over 50 emails from SpamCop. It absorbed my inbox so much in fact I could not retrieve my incoming mail. OverMax. Thanks again, I shall follow your prompts as suggested:) Lisa Mike Easter wrote: >Lisa wrote: > > >>Please unsubscribe me from your mailing list. Thank you >> >> > >It doesn't work like that. When you subscribe to a mailing list, you >have to be able to unsubscribe from the mailing list -- no one can do it >for you. > >Where you subscribed is a mechanism for removing yourself. > >Every mail item you receive from the mailing list has that information >in both the headers of the messages as well as a trailer at the bottom >every message. > >You can click this: >mailto:spamcop-mail-request@news.spamcop.net?subject=unsubscribe > >You can go here http://news.spamcop.net/mailman/listinfo/spamcop-mail > >and go to the bottom of the page and follow the unsub instructions. > > > From MikeE at ster.invalid Thu May 4 19:49:05 2006 From: MikeE at ster.invalid (Mike Easter) Date: Thu May 4 21:50:12 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Mail] Re: REMOVE ME References: Message-ID: Lisa wrote: > I just received over 50 emails from SpamCop. It absorbed my inbox so > much in fact I could not retrieve my incoming mail. OverMax. Thanks > again, I shall follow your prompts as suggested:) There's a big advantage in participating or lurking here by using a newsreader instead of subscribing to the mailing list. News messages don't fill up your mailbox. Your mailuser agent Tbird functions as a newsreader as well as a mailuser agent. This tutorial describes how to setup newsgroup accounts in Tbird http://opensourcearticles.com/articles/introduction_to_thunderbird_8 An introduction to Thunderbird, part 8 -- Newsgroups -- Mike Easter kibitzer, not SC admin From nobody at devnull.spamcop.net Mon May 8 17:47:10 2006 From: nobody at devnull.spamcop.net (POP) Date: Mon May 8 16:50:02 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Mail] Mail Lists Q Message-ID: Huh, hadn't thought about mail lists in eons, I think; at least years. They almost always seem to unleash almost a ddos attack on one's inbox and many unsuspecting newbies seem to still get caught in them, no matter how well the descrips warn people about the possible onslaught of messages. Which brings me to my question/s: What purpose and what kind of person would subscribe to a full blown mailing list? What use could they be? I've thought about databases; no, way too much crud to pick thru. A very lonely person? Maybe; if they like to read. To learn? Suppose that's a possibility. A mailing list could help one cull out the misfits ahead of time I suppose, and there is a lot of good information hidden away in the many mails, but ... sheesh, a couple days/weeks of lurking will do the same thing, and probably a lot quicker. Anyone got any responses that might make me feel like I have one less ignorance-area in my life? Regards, Pop From MikeE at ster.invalid Mon May 8 14:58:25 2006 From: MikeE at ster.invalid (Mike Easter) Date: Mon May 8 17:00:03 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Mail] Re: Mail Lists Q References: Message-ID: POP wrote: > What purpose and what kind of person would subscribe to a full > blown mailing list? What use could they be? There are many many different kinds of mailing lists and mailing lists function 'similarly' to web based forums and nntp based newsgroups; so, the same 'kind of' people who would participate in any electronic community forum would participate in a mailing list. It is relatively simple to setup and manage. Each of the methods, webforum, mailing list, nntp newsgroup - has its own advantages and disadvantages and very often they completely overlap. Examples are gmane for overlapping newsgroups, webforum, and mailing lists and grc for overlapping webforum and nntp news. Googlegroups is another example of overlapping a web interface and a mailing list. Some support systems provide the support *only* in the form of mailing lists, not nntp or web based. -- Mike Easter kibitzer, not SC admin From tmcgraw at spamcop.net Mon May 8 17:30:14 2006 From: tmcgraw at spamcop.net (Tim McGraw) Date: Mon May 8 19:35:03 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Mail] Re: Mail Lists Q In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: POP wrote: > > What purpose and what kind of person would subscribe to a full > blown mailing list? What use could they be? Have you never been a developer? From pumpkin at spamcop.net Thu May 11 23:07:32 2006 From: pumpkin at spamcop.net (Nat) Date: Thu May 11 23:10:02 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Mail] Pop down? Not forwarding either Message-ID: I POP my email but it is not being filtered and/or forwarded. Anyone else? Nat -- Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has. --Margaret Mead From jamie_usenet at yahoo.ca Fri May 12 16:43:26 2006 From: jamie_usenet at yahoo.ca (Jamie) Date: Fri May 12 15:45:14 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Mail] Glorb Internet Services are spammers Message-ID: Geoff Brozny the owner of Glorb Internet Services is the one responsible for this spam. He spammed several of my mailboxes Glorb Internet Services http://www.glorb.com/ Phone Numbers: 614-448-1305 or 1-866-815-5637 Address: Glorb Internet Services PO Box 481 Blacklick, OH 43004-0481 The spammers dropbox at darkshad_2006@yahoo.ca needs to be immediately terminated. Also Yahoo remove the fake profile setup by Geoff Brozny at http://personals.yahoo.com/us/personals-1147191471-257254 copyright@yahoo-inc.com has already been contacted about this matter with a properly formatted request to remove this site. Why has this site not been removed? The individual has a picture of me on the website. Geoff Brozny has setup this fake profile just to further harase me. He also has a picture of me on this website which I own and he has NO permission to use on this webpage. Yahoo please have your chief legal council immediately call me at 416-781-0627 Geoff Brozny is a spammer and has spammed several of my mailboxes. Geoff is also the one who runs Glorb Internet Services. Level3 Remove this spammers websites immediately. http://www.jamiebaillie.com http://www.spamtard.com http://www.jamiebaillie.com/lamie_pure-pride.htm 05/12/06 13:44:32 dns www.jamiebaillie.com Canonical name: www.jamiebaillie.com Addresses: 64.192.187.20 05/12/06 13:44:50 dns www.spamtard.com Canonical name: www.spamtard.com Addresses: 64.192.187.20 05/12/06 13:45:00 IP block www.spamtard.com Trying 64.192.187.20 at ARIN Trying 64.192.187 at ARIN Level 3 Communications, Inc. LVLT-ORG-64-192 (NET-64-192-0-0-1) 64.192.0.0 - 64.195.255.255 Glorb Internet Services WLCO-TWC02161560-GLORB (NET-64-192-186-0-1) 64.192.186.0 - 64.192.187.255 # ARIN WHOIS database, last updated 2006-05-11 19:10 # Enter ? for additional hints on searching ARIN's WHOIS database. 05/12/06 13:45:10 whois !NET-64-192-0-0-1@whois.arin.net whois -h whois.arin.net !net-64-192-0-0-1 ... OrgName: Level 3 Communications, Inc. OrgID: LVLT Address: 1025 Eldorado Blvd. City: Broomfield StateProv: CO PostalCode: 80021 Country: US NetRange: 64.192.0.0 - 64.195.255.255 CIDR: 64.192.0.0/14 NetName: LVLT-ORG-64-192 NetHandle: NET-64-192-0-0-1 Parent: NET-64-0-0-0-0 NetType: Direct Allocation NameServer: STLDNS1.WCG.NET NameServer: TULDNS1.WCG.NET Comment: RegDate: 2004-07-13 Updated: 2006-03-16 OrgAbuseHandle: APL8-ARIN OrgAbuseName: Abuse POC LVLT OrgAbusePhone: +1-877-453-8353 OrgAbuseEmail: abuse@level3.com OrgTechHandle: ARINC4-ARIN OrgTechName: ARIN Contact OrgTechPhone: +1-800-436-8489 OrgTechEmail: arin-contact@genuity.com OrgTechHandle: TPL1-ARIN OrgTechName: Tech POC LVLT OrgTechPhone: +1-877-453-8353 OrgTechEmail: ipaddressing@level3.com # ARIN WHOIS database, last updated 2006-05-11 19:10 # Enter ? for additional hints on searching ARIN's WHOIS database. 05/12/06 13:45:33 whois !NET-64-192-186-0-1@whois.arin.net whois -h whois.arin.net !net-64-192-186-0-1 ... OrgName: Glorb Internet Services OrgID: GIS-71 Address: 226 N. Fifth St. City: Columbus StateProv: OH PostalCode: 43215 Country: US NetRange: 64.192.186.0 - 64.192.187.255 CIDR: 64.192.186.0/23 NetName: WLCO-TWC02161560-GLORB NetHandle: NET-64-192-186-0-1 Parent: NET-64-192-0-0-1 NetType: Reallocated Comment: RegDate: 2004-11-30 Updated: 2004-11-30 RTechHandle: GIS-ARIN RTechName: Glorb Internet Services RTechPhone: +1-614-448-1305 RTechEmail: sysop@glorb.com OrgAbuseHandle: GISAD-ARIN OrgAbuseName: Glorb Internet Services Abuse Department OrgAbusePhone: +1-614-448-1305 OrgAbuseEmail: abuse@glorb.com OrgTechHandle: GIS-ARIN OrgTechName: Glorb Internet Services OrgTechPhone: +1-614-448-1305 OrgTechEmail: sysop@glorb.com # ARIN WHOIS database, last updated 2006-05-11 19:10 # Enter ? for additional hints on searching ARIN's WHOIS database. See that immediate action is taken against this spammer and he is removed from your network. Since it is the owner of Glorb Internet Services who is responsible for this abuse forwarding the complaint Glorb Internet Services will not help in this matter. Please see that action is taken. Jamie X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on darkshad X-Spam-Level: **** X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.9 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,X_MESSAGE_INFO autolearn=no version=3.1.0 X-Message-Status: n:0 X-SID-PRA: Jamie Spammer X-SID-Result: TempError X-Message-Info: txF49lGdW435p7ctVWYR2AnXQCf7dvYZCtJEbkaVH8s= Received: from 192.168.0.1 [192.168.0.1] by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-6.2.5.2) for darkshad@localhost (single-drop); Thu, 11 May 2006 20:08:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from web38411.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([209.191.125.42]) by bay0-mc3-f12.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 11 May 2006 17:11:01 -0700 Received: (qmail 24962 invoked by uid 60001); 12 May 2006 00:11:00 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.ca; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=fotKBt9diPkm1dGe//QjQq9LNctHYWKnCG3nt6SA0RhzFsgcC/hMQ00SF+Np7Fu2rnd+HbZ778Vu/fsXJv1n97etN58NuyUJb56OOvId6/M8Gnc3IRgClG7FA3XGQQB9bt5MrljWzwU9CdvOvs1+uWLby90bta9Ey1t8l/s6zFI= ; Message-ID: <20060512001100.24960.qmail@web38411.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [201.18.75.26] by web38411.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 11 May 2006 20:11:00 EDT Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 20:11:00 -0400 (EDT) From: Jamie Spammer Subject: Jamie Baillie the criminal To: jamie_usenet@yahoo.ca MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1051690671-1147392660=:24922" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-Path: darkshad_2006@yahoo.ca X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 May 2006 00:11:01.0848 (UTC) FILETIME=[8D847D80:01C67558] Status: ----- Original Message ----- From: Jamie Spammer To: jamie_usenet@yahoo.ca Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 8:11 PM Subject: Jamie Baillie the criminal Find out more about this known criminal at http://www.jamiebaillie.com http://www.spamtard.com He also has a personal ad at http://personals.yahoo.com/us/personals-1147191471-257254 He is a very well known racist and spammer. http://www.jamiebaillie.com/lamie_pure-pride.htm In a nutshell, Jamie Baillie is a mentally-challenged individual who lives in the Ontario, Canada area who is desperate for attention. He pretends to be an anti-spammer while being a spammer himself. He's been caught spamming, abusing open proxies, and trying to buy lists of proxies to spam through. When cornered, his response is "It was a hacker". Yet he cannot even try to answer questions about when or how his PC was "hacked", what the vulnerability was, when and how it was fixed, and which posts in the "hacked" period of time are really from him and which are really from the hacker. But, since there are several common threads throughout *all* of the posts (certain mispellings he cannot fix, like "harasement", "defamitory", "tollerated", and my favorite, "paided"), it's painfully clear that all websites, posts, and other evidence came from one person. Ordinarily, it would be poor sport indeed to keep "harasing" such an obviously troubled individual. *But*... not only does he keep bringing this sort of thing down on his own head by filing huge, rambling "abuse reports" about anyone who dares to notice his misdeeds; he also is a continuing spammer who will continue to abuse the Internet if left alone. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From kingpin+nntp.spamcop.net at lumbercartel.ca Fri May 26 13:24:59 2006 From: kingpin+nntp.spamcop.net at lumbercartel.ca (Mr. King of-my-forest Pin) Date: Fri May 26 15:25:12 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Mail] Reporting system not reporting to source ISPs Message-ID: Has anyone else noticed a problem with SC version 1.573? It appears that it was implemented late this morning, and now the only party I can report my spam to is the "Cyveillance spam collection." Even the responsible party for the source IP of the spam isn't listed at all. Also, it would be very helpful in the preferences to have a reporting option that will automatically turn off reports to all parties except the source IP identified in the first valid "Received" SMTP header -- when folks don't have a lot of time to check through all the parties being reported to simply because their web site was referenced in the spam, at least the DNSBL can still get the data. Thanks in advance, and please keep up the good work! -- The Lumber Cartel, local 42 (Canadian Branch) Vancouver, Beautiful British Columbia, Canada http://www.lumbercartel.ca/ From eddie at eddie.web Fri May 26 16:24:56 2006 From: eddie at eddie.web (eddie) Date: Fri May 26 15:30:04 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Mail] Re: Reporting system not reporting to source ISPs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Mr. King of-my-forest Pin wrote: > Has anyone else noticed a problem with SC version 1.573? It appears > that it was implemented late this morning, and now the only party I can > report my spam to is the "Cyveillance spam collection." Even the > responsible party for the source IP of the spam isn't listed at all. > > Also, it would be very helpful in the preferences to have a > reporting option that will automatically turn off reports to all > parties except the source IP identified in the first valid "Received" > SMTP header -- when folks don't have a lot of time to check through all > the parties being reported to simply because their web site was > referenced in the spam, at least the DNSBL can still get the data. > > Thanks in advance, and please keep up the good work! > I guess SC has finally given up. I will be deleting my held mail until this problem is fixed. For all I know, this is the new SC - all reporters are moles. Darwin had it backwards. The Cavemen were the smartest - we are dirt. From kingpin+nntp.spamcop.net at lumbercartel.ca Fri May 26 13:31:07 2006 From: kingpin+nntp.spamcop.net at lumbercartel.ca (Mr. King of-my-forest Pin) Date: Fri May 26 15:30:05 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Mail] 50% resolved: Reporting system not reporting to source ISPs References: Message-ID: On Fri, 26 May 2006 12:24:59 -0700, Mr. King of-my-forest Pin wrote: > Has anyone else noticed a problem with SC version 1.573? It appears > that it was implemented late this morning, and now the only party I can > report my spam to is the "Cyveillance spam collection." Even the > responsible party for the source IP of the spam isn't listed at all. The problem seems to be fixed now -- they reveted to v1.564.2.1. > Also, it would be very helpful in the preferences to have a reporting > option that will automatically turn off reports to all parties except > the source IP identified in the first valid "Received" SMTP header -- > when folks don't have a lot of time to check through all the parties > being reported to simply because their web site was referenced in the > spam, at least the DNSBL can still get the data. > > Thanks in advance, and please keep up the good work! I still hope for an answer to this question. Thanks. -- The Lumber Cartel, local 42 (Canadian Branch) Vancouver, Beautiful British Columbia, Canada http://www.lumbercartel.ca/ From tmcgraw at spamcop.net Fri May 26 14:11:27 2006 From: tmcgraw at spamcop.net (Tim McGraw) Date: Fri May 26 16:15:03 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Mail] Re: 50% resolved: Reporting system not reporting to source ISPs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Mr. King of-my-forest Pin wrote: > > I still hope for an answer to this question. Thanks. > > --The Lumber Cartel, local 42 (Canadian Branch) > Vancouver, Beautiful British Columbia, Canada > http://www.lumbercartel.ca/ While we (tinw) welcome the Canadian Branch of the Lumber Cartel (TINLC), discussions about the behavior of the sc parser are best posted over there ----> on spamcop (no extension). For mail issues (CES) the forums are preferred, altho this dark corner obviously gets read by a few of us (tinu). From nobody at devnull.spamcop.net Fri May 26 16:14:01 2006 From: nobody at devnull.spamcop.net (WazoO) Date: Fri May 26 16:15:06 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Mail] Re: Reporting system not reporting to source ISPs References: Message-ID: "Mr. King of-my-forest Pin" wrote in message news:op.s96avxsxyax69d@qi... > Has anyone else noticed a problem with SC version 1.573? It appears > that it was implemented late this morning, and now the only party I can > report my spam to is the "Cyveillance spam collection." Even the > responsible party for the source IP of the spam isn't listed at all. The issue is that this wasn't a SpamCop E-Mail Account issue, so traffic on this was seen in the spamcop newsgroup and the Forum. As I posted into the spamcop newsgroup; From: "WazoO" Newsgroups: spamcop Subject: Re: spamcop not reporting to abuse address? Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 15:07:14 -0500 Message-ID: References: "cwg" wrote in message news:e57k7u$uar$1@news.spamcop.net... > > What? Not going to report the spam to the listed abuse address? Forum Topic/Discussion, same subject: Not sending reports to ISP!? Nothing to do Staff Notifications sent http://forum.spamcop.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=6436 Announcement posted New Parsing code broken - maybe fixed now? http://forum.spamcop.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=6438 As seen, instead of making multiple posts, starting multiple threads, a bit of analysis was applied, e-mail sent to the necessary people ... code was rolled back before I got a reply, but .. that's what one would like to have happen ... issue seems to be resolved at the moment .... From kingpin+nntp.spamcop.net at lumbercartel.ca Mon May 29 11:39:59 2006 From: kingpin+nntp.spamcop.net at lumbercartel.ca (Mr. King of-my-forest Pin) Date: Mon May 29 13:40:03 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Mail] Re: 50% resolved: Reporting system not reporting to source ISPs References: Message-ID: On Fri, 26 May 2006 13:11:27 -0700, Tim McGraw wrote: > Mr. King of-my-forest Pin wrote: > >> I still hope for an answer to this question. Thanks. >> --The Lumber Cartel, local 42 (Canadian Branch) >> Vancouver, Beautiful British Columbia, Canada >> http://www.lumbercartel.ca/ > > While we (tinw) welcome the Canadian Branch of the Lumber Cartel > (TINLC), discussions about the behavior of the sc parser are best posted > over there ----> on spamcop (no extension). For mail issues (CES) the > forums are preferred, altho this dark corner obviously gets read by a > few of us (tinu). Thank you for the direction (and the welcome), I'll keep that in mind for future (your help is greatly appreciated). The reason I posted here is that the SpamCop.Net help pages directed me here, and because I'm still getting used to this NNTP client software I didn't see the list of newsgroups. P.S.: I've been reporting spam to SpamCop.Net for many years, and according to my "logs" almost 50,000 spams have been reported through a non-obvious account name. The SpamCop.Net DNSBL works wonders on all the servers that I'm responsible for, and although I find the reporting procedure extremely time-consuming given my reporting volume, I haven't let one spam get deleted without first being reported. I see this as time well spent because the SpamCop.Net system works extremely well in my strong opinion, and I continue to encourage others to use it. -- The Lumber Cartel, local 42 (Canadian Branch) Vancouver, Beautiful British Columbia, Canada http://www.lumbercartel.ca/