Re: Defenders of "under god" are ... mislead or misleading (pick
bcs1 at spamcop.net
Fri Sep 23 04:12:50 EDT 2005
"David Dean" <ozchzhq02 at sneakemail.com> wrote in message
news:ozchzhq02-69C42F.09105922092005 at frylock.local...
> In article <dgtal7$i6i$1 at news.spamcop.net>, "Bcs1" <bcs1 at spamcop.net>
>> nor should they be set aside because of the views of the few.......
> Your rights aren't being set aside if the court rules that government
> officials can't instigate recitation of the Pledge. You can say it all
> you want however you want in any setting where you are permitted to
> exercise your first amendment rights.
you are correct, however I can see one possible outcome of the whole mess,
and that's not something I would want to see
More information about the SpamCop-Social