From nobody at spamcop.net Thu Jun 1 11:28:52 2006 From: nobody at spamcop.net (indigo) Date: Thu Jun 1 10:30:03 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Social] Re: Trying hard ... References: Message-ID: Charles wrote: > ... to keep the place alive. I nominate David to post a link to a > news story showing what an asshole the shrub is. And then, hmmm... We do need a good roaring debate in here....only thing is BCS Bill ain't posting so we have no shrub defenders to pound on! From kenbrody at spamcop.net Thu Jun 1 11:33:58 2006 From: kenbrody at spamcop.net (Kenneth Brody) Date: Thu Jun 1 10:40:04 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Social] Re: Rolled over References: Message-ID: <447EFAD6.86DCA3BD@spamcop.net> Charles wrote: > > Ayup - my 3 week old rolled over today. Dang! Even the doctor is > impressed by such a young baby who has already gained more than 2 pounds! > This will be a BIG baby. Which is all the more interesting given what a > peanut his "big" bro is... Well, none of our kids ever rolled over quite so soon. I'm not sure if "congrats" or "look out!" is appropriate. :-) However, all four of our kids picked their head up and looked around within a minute of being born. (Born. Placed on mom's chest. Picked head up and looked around.) -- +-------------------------+--------------------+-----------------------------+ | Kenneth J. Brody | www.hvcomputer.com | | | kenbrody/at\spamcop.net | www.fptech.com | #include | +-------------------------+--------------------+-----------------------------+ Don't e-mail me at: From avoozl at spamcop.net Thu Jun 1 09:22:21 2006 From: avoozl at spamcop.net (Chris F. Willoughby) Date: Thu Jun 1 11:20:01 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Social] Re: The NSA... References: Message-ID: "David Dean" wrote in message news:ozchzhq02-69BADD.09464401062006@frylock.local... > In article , > FCC already gave up saying that they don't have the security > clearances to investigate. > > -- > -David > > Quis custodiet custodes ipsos? That's ironic. Aren't they the ones supposedly responsible for ALL comm traffic? I mean.. come on. If THEY aren't cleared then WHO is? Chris From nobody at spamcop.net Thu Jun 1 12:48:12 2006 From: nobody at spamcop.net (Spamvireslayer) Date: Thu Jun 1 11:55:04 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Social] Re: Rolled over References: Message-ID: "Charles" <8hmte5s02@sneakemail.com> wrote in message news:Xns97D56170083C1TheShrubIsAnAss@216.154.195.61... > Ayup - my 3 week old rolled over today. Dang! Even the doctor is > impressed by such a young baby who has already gained more than 2 pounds! > This will be a BIG baby. Which is all the more interesting given what a > peanut his "big" bro is... So what's the milkman look like, then? From chris.a.wright at gmail.com Thu Jun 1 17:55:08 2006 From: chris.a.wright at gmail.com (Chris Wright) Date: Thu Jun 1 11:55:05 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Social] Re: Trying hard ... In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: David Dean wrote: > In article , > "indigo" wrote: > >> We do need a good roaring debate in here....only thing is BCS Bill ain't >> posting so we have no shrub defenders to pound on! > > There is one person in my bozo bin who is still posting.... want to > guess? > Must be me then From me at privacy.net Thu Jun 1 13:42:11 2006 From: me at privacy.net (Frog Prince) Date: Thu Jun 1 12:45:04 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Social] Re: Rolled over References: Message-ID: "Charles" < | | >> Ayup - my 3 week old rolled over today. Dang! Even the doctor is | >> impressed by such a young baby who has already gained more than 2 | >> pounds! This will be a BIG baby. Which is all the more interesting | >> given what a peanut his "big" bro is... | > | > So what's the milkman look like, then? | | Oh, he's a big guy - round head... Hmm... You've checked THAT closely? From nobody at spamcop.net Thu Jun 1 16:02:44 2006 From: nobody at spamcop.net (indigo) Date: Thu Jun 1 15:05:04 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Social] Re: Trying hard ... References: Message-ID: David Dean wrote: > In article , > "indigo" wrote: > > > We do need a good roaring debate in here....only thing is BCS Bill > > ain't posting so we have no shrub defenders to pound on! > > There is one person in my bozo bin who is still posting.... want to > guess? I have no idea....what did Charles do to you? From nobody at spamcop.net Thu Jun 1 16:03:45 2006 From: nobody at spamcop.net (indigo) Date: Thu Jun 1 15:05:05 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Social] Re: Rolled over References: Message-ID: Charles wrote: > It wasn't me! It was "Frog Prince" ! > > "Charles" < > > >| > So what's the milkman look like, then? > >| > >| Oh, he's a big guy - round head... Hmm... > > > > You've checked THAT closely? > > Hey, no need to check closely, man, it's all right out in the open... he delivers the mail in the raw? From nobody at spamcop.net Thu Jun 1 17:07:59 2006 From: nobody at spamcop.net (indigo) Date: Thu Jun 1 16:10:02 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Social] Re: Trying hard ... References: Message-ID: Charles wrote: > It wasn't me! It was David Dean ! > > > The person in question is a Randite > > Um, we've got more than one of those... A what? From nobody at spamcop.net Thu Jun 1 17:08:33 2006 From: nobody at spamcop.net (indigo) Date: Thu Jun 1 16:10:03 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Social] Re: Trying hard ... References: Message-ID: David Dean wrote: > In article , > Charles <8hmte5s02@sneakemail.com> wrote: > > > Um, we've got more than one of those... > > I'm a bit of a libertarian myself, you want easy clues or > something? I do, seeing as hardly *anyone* has been posting here recently! From nobody at spamcop.net Thu Jun 1 17:09:27 2006 From: nobody at spamcop.net (indigo) Date: Thu Jun 1 16:10:03 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Social] Re: Rolled over References: Message-ID: Charles wrote: > It wasn't me! It was "indigo" ! > > Charles wrote: > > >> Hey, no need to check closely, man, it's all right out in the > >> open... > > > > he delivers the mail in the raw? > > Uh, no, not usually. Hmm. No, not ever. Now, milk, that's another > story... Oh, I see....raw mail delivered by a nude milkman! From johnl at in.newsgroup.only Thu Jun 1 21:20:46 2006 From: johnl at in.newsgroup.only (JohnL) Date: Thu Jun 1 16:25:06 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Social] Re: Trying hard ... References: Message-ID: David Dean wrote in news:ozchzhq02- 9585CA.16135101062006@frylock.local: > This semi-troll last posted 5/23/06 (That should be a dead giveaway) Red??? From nobody at spamcop.net Thu Jun 1 17:56:41 2006 From: nobody at spamcop.net (indigo) Date: Thu Jun 1 17:00:04 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Social] Re: Trying hard ... References: Message-ID: David Dean wrote: > In article , > JohnL wrote: > > > Red??? > > Begins with an E... Ernest? Ebony? Elliot? ELLEN?!? From nobody at spamcop.net Thu Jun 1 17:57:03 2006 From: nobody at spamcop.net (indigo) Date: Thu Jun 1 17:00:05 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Social] Re: Trying hard ... References: Message-ID: David Dean wrote: > In article , > "indigo" wrote: > > > A what? > > Rand as in Ayn Rand... Still drawing a blank... From johnl at in.newsgroup.only Thu Jun 1 21:59:34 2006 From: johnl at in.newsgroup.only (JohnL) Date: Thu Jun 1 17:00:06 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Social] Re: Trying hard ... References: Message-ID: David Dean wrote in news:ozchzhq02- 8B0AF8.16320101062006@frylock.local: > Begins with an E... Likes the desert? From nobody at spamcop.net Thu Jun 1 18:07:56 2006 From: nobody at spamcop.net (indigo) Date: Thu Jun 1 17:10:02 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Social] Re: Trying hard ... References: Message-ID: JohnL wrote: > David Dean wrote in news:ozchzhq02- > 8B0AF8.16320101062006@frylock.local: > > > Begins with an E... > > Likes the desert? Or lives in Houston? From johnl at in.newsgroup.only Thu Jun 1 22:13:51 2006 From: johnl at in.newsgroup.only (JohnL) Date: Thu Jun 1 17:15:03 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Social] Re: Trying hard ... References: Message-ID: "indigo" wrote in news:e5nkvd$bdk$1@news.spamcop.net: > > > JohnL wrote: >> David Dean wrote in news:ozchzhq02- >> 8B0AF8.16320101062006@frylock.local: >> >> > Begins with an E... >> >> Likes the desert? > > Or lives in Houston? > > Hmm, maybe Central North U.S. From johnl at in.newsgroup.only Thu Jun 1 22:14:28 2006 From: johnl at in.newsgroup.only (JohnL) Date: Thu Jun 1 17:15:04 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Social] Re: Trying hard ... References: Message-ID: JohnL wrote in news:Xns97D59AF0CB9C8innewsgrouponly@216.154.195.61: > Hmm, maybe Central North U.S. ...and if it'as who I think it is, I agree. From post.please.this.email.is.not.valid at example.com Thu Jun 1 17:23:11 2006 From: post.please.this.email.is.not.valid at example.com (DougW) Date: Thu Jun 1 17:25:02 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Social] Re: revenge is sweet References: Message-ID: Sylvesterthekat did pass the time by typing: > http://publius-ovidius.livejournal.com/111672.html > > and if you don't already own a shredder, buy one now! (seems they may have > got at least some of the info from discarded visa checks) That's one good read. On the shredders, get a crosscut of the smallest cut size you can find. Arora AS501X-MS is a good (and cheap) one and will take a credit card. That and crosscut shredders output is less bulky than strip shredders. -- DougW From dws at dealing-with-spam.info Fri Jun 2 00:54:32 2006 From: dws at dealing-with-spam.info (D-W-S) Date: Thu Jun 1 17:55:03 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Social] Re: Cat rap. References: <4ddo72l611vrgm74t4akkkcjgs6l7m7vbh@4ax.com> Message-ID: Kenneth Loafman wrote on Tue, 30 May 2006 07:09:56 -0500: >>030366 (10 quatloos to whomever finds that reference) > > Just google it! The first one is the answer. > http://www.lyricsdepot.com/stratovarius/030366.html Heh - I didn't think it would appear that high in the results (not that I looked) Oh well. Here you are. +-------------+ | | | 10 Quatloos | | | +-------------+ I can't decide whether I prefer "Fourth Dimension" (from which 030366 is taken) or "Destiny". From nobody at devnull.spamcop.net Thu Jun 1 19:03:38 2006 From: nobody at devnull.spamcop.net (Eponym) Date: Thu Jun 1 18:10:02 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Social] Re: Trying hard ... References: Message-ID: "JohnL" wrote in message news:Xns97D59B0B77D8innewsgrouponly@216.154.195.61... > JohnL wrote in > news:Xns97D59AF0CB9C8innewsgrouponly@216.154.195.61: > >> Hmm, maybe Central North U.S. > > ...and if it'as who I think it is, I agree. hmmm....everybody hates me so much that they don't even know it...ironic From johnl at in.newsgroup.only Thu Jun 1 23:11:51 2006 From: johnl at in.newsgroup.only (JohnL) Date: Thu Jun 1 18:15:02 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Social] Re: Trying hard ... References: Message-ID: "Eponym" wrote in news:e5nobj$dv1$1 @news.spamcop.net: > hmmm....everybody hates me so much that they don't even know it...ironic No one said hate, no one said a name, but if the shoe fits.... From nobody at devnull.spamcop.net Thu Jun 1 19:18:24 2006 From: nobody at devnull.spamcop.net (Eponym) Date: Thu Jun 1 18:25:04 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Social] Re: Trying hard ... References: Message-ID: "JohnL" wrote in message news:Xns97D5A4C665564innewsgrouponly@216.154.195.61... > "Eponym" wrote in news:e5nobj$dv1$1 > @news.spamcop.net: > >> hmmm....everybody hates me so much that they don't even know it...ironic > > No one said hate, no one said a name, but if the shoe fits.... I've got a thick head...and the skin to go with it. So, whatever From johnl at in.newsgroup.only Thu Jun 1 23:23:31 2006 From: johnl at in.newsgroup.only (JohnL) Date: Thu Jun 1 18:25:04 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Social] Re: Trying hard ... References: Message-ID: "Eponym" wrote in news:e5np79$elu$1 @news.spamcop.net: > I've got a thick head...and the skin to go with it. So, whatever Now _that_ shoe fits! :) From johnl at in.newsgroup.only Fri Jun 2 00:40:23 2006 From: johnl at in.newsgroup.only (JohnL) Date: Thu Jun 1 19:45:04 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Social] Re: Rolled over References: Message-ID: Charles <8hmte5s02@sneakemail.com> wrote in news:Xns97D5C7DE033EDTheShrubIsAnAss@216.154.195.61: > Why do you keep insisting on mail? No mail! No mail! NO MAIL!!!! > Milk, on the other hand... ... is delivered by a naked male... or female? From johnl at in.newsgroup.only Fri Jun 2 00:48:49 2006 From: johnl at in.newsgroup.only (JohnL) Date: Thu Jun 1 19:50:03 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Social] Re: Rolled over References: Message-ID: Charles <8hmte5s02@sneakemail.com> wrote in news:Xns97D5C94C53BA5TheShrubIsAnAss@216.154.195.61: > No way it was me! It was JohnL ! >> Charles <8hmte5s02@sneakemail.com> wrote in >> news:Xns97D5C7DE033EDTheShrubIsAnAss@216.154.195.61: >> >>> Milk, on the other hand... >> >> ... is delivered by a naked [...] female? > > Between 8PM and 6Am it is! > ... Took me a second on that..... but...... ROTFL!!! From me at privacy.net Thu Jun 1 22:26:28 2006 From: me at privacy.net (NotMe) Date: Thu Jun 1 21:30:08 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Social] Re: Rolled over References: Message-ID: "Charles" | | >> > he delivers the mail in the raw? | >> | >> Uh, no, not usually. Hmm. No, not ever. Now, milk, that's another | >> story... | > | > Oh, I see....raw mail delivered by a nude milkman! | | Why do you keep insisting on mail? No mail! No mail! NO MAIL!!!! Milk, | on the other hand... If he has milk on his hands ... what makes you so sure it's milk? From me at privacy.net Thu Jun 1 22:27:19 2006 From: me at privacy.net (NotMe) Date: Thu Jun 1 21:35:03 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Social] Re: Rolled over References: Message-ID: "Charles" | >>> | >>>> Milk, on the other hand... | >>> | >>> ... is delivered by a naked [...] female? | >> | >> Between 8PM and 6Am it is! yea and it comes in such cute containers. | > | > ... Took me a second on that..... but...... ROTFL!!! | | What's funny about it? It's poifectly natural goodness (mmm, mmm!). From nobody at spamcop.net Fri Jun 2 10:12:08 2006 From: nobody at spamcop.net (indigo) Date: Fri Jun 2 09:15:09 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Social] Re: Trying hard ... References: Message-ID: Charles wrote: > No way it was me! It was "indigo" ! > > David Dean wrote: > >> In article , > >> "indigo" wrote: > >> > >> > A what? > >> > >> Rand as in Ayn Rand... > > > > Still drawing a blank... > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ayn_Rand > "Her philosophy and her fiction both emphasize, above all, the > concepts of individualism, rational egoism ("rational > self-interest"), and capitalism, which she believed should be > implemented fully via laissez-faire capitalism. She believed that > people must choose their values and actions by reason; that the > individual has a right to exist for his or her own sake, neither > sacrificing self to others nor others to self; and that no one has > the right to take what belongs to others by physical force or fraud, > or impose their moral code on others by physical force. Her politics > have been described as minarchism and libertarianism, though she > never used the first term and detested the second." Thanks. I can't get to wiki from work for some reason (fastmail.fm neither no more). No exactly terrible way of looking at the world, she has? I would take it one step further, in that "no one shall impose their moral code on others by force OR by legislation". From nobody at spamcop.net Fri Jun 2 10:13:47 2006 From: nobody at spamcop.net (indigo) Date: Fri Jun 2 09:15:12 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Social] Re: Trying hard ... References: Message-ID: Eponym wrote: > "JohnL" wrote in message > news:Xns97D5A4C665564innewsgrouponly@216.154.195.61... > > "Eponym" wrote in news:e5nobj$dv1$1 > > @news.spamcop.net: > > > >> hmmm....everybody hates me so much that they don't even know > >> it...ironic > > > > No one said hate, no one said a name, but if the shoe fits.... > > I've got a thick head...and the skin to go with it. So, whatever Huh. I never would have guessed. While I violently disagree with some of the things you write, they're not plonkable offenses in my book. I don't think you troll, you just inflame ;-) From nobody at spamcop.net Fri Jun 2 10:15:23 2006 From: nobody at spamcop.net (indigo) Date: Fri Jun 2 09:20:03 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Social] Re: revenge is sweet References: Message-ID: Charles wrote: > No way it was me! It was "DougW" > ! > > > On the shredders, get a crosscut of the smallest cut size you can > > find. Arora AS501X-MS is a good (and cheap) one and will take a > > credit card. > > Well, we heat with wood, so... Most things go pretty easily. But I > called my CC company and chewed them out BIG TIME for sending me > those stupid checks. I think I had to call 3 times (over a 9 month > period) before they finally stopped. But they did stop. Of course, > my CC info has since been stolen, but that's because of crappy online > retailers and has nothing to do with my mail (IMO). Oops....I think I breezed thru the original post too fast....are you saying that those "transfer checks" I sometimes get from my CC company can steal my account info even though I tear them into 2-4 pieces? From nobody at spamcop.net Fri Jun 2 10:55:28 2006 From: nobody at spamcop.net (indigo) Date: Fri Jun 2 10:00:02 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Social] Re: Rolled over References: Message-ID: Charles wrote: > No way it was me! It was "indigo" ! > > Charles wrote: > >> It wasn't me! It was "indigo" ! > > >> > he delivers the mail in the raw? > >> > >> Uh, no, not usually. Hmm. No, not ever. Now, milk, that's > >> another story... > > > > Oh, I see....raw mail delivered by a nude milkman! > > Why do you keep insisting on mail? No mail! No mail! NO MAIL!!!! > Milk, on the other hand... You're so far out in the boonies you don't get mail delivery? That's a shame.... From nobody at spamcop.net Fri Jun 2 10:58:12 2006 From: nobody at spamcop.net (indigo) Date: Fri Jun 2 10:00:03 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Social] Re: Trying hard ... References: Message-ID: David Dean wrote: > In article , > "indigo" wrote: > > > "no one shall impose their moral code on > > others by force OR by legislation". > > How many have to agree that murder is wrong before it becomes > illegal? Of course I knew someone was going to respond with something like this when I wrote that post.......in my head I was thinking abortion, school prayer, sex education (or lack of it), yadda yadda yadda....any pet project of the whacko religious right..... From nobody at devnull.spamcop.net Fri Jun 2 11:05:28 2006 From: nobody at devnull.spamcop.net (Eponym) Date: Fri Jun 2 10:10:05 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Social] Re: Trying hard ... References: Message-ID: "David Dean" wrote in message news:ozchzhq02-A5418B.09483302062006@frylock.local... > In article , > "indigo" wrote: > >> "no one shall impose their moral code on >> others by force OR by legislation". > > How many have to agree that murder is wrong before it becomes illegal? > "that no one has the right to take what belongs to others by physical force" I'd say murder is taking someone's life by physical force. http://www.jonathangullible.com/mmedia/PhilosophyOfLiberty-english_music.swf From post.please.this.email.is.not.valid at example.com Fri Jun 2 10:16:21 2006 From: post.please.this.email.is.not.valid at example.com (DougW) Date: Fri Jun 2 10:20:03 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Social] Re: revenge is sweet References: Message-ID: indigo did pass the time by typing: > Charles wrote: >> No way it was me! It was "DougW" >> ! >> >>> On the shredders, get a crosscut of the smallest cut size you can >>> find. Arora AS501X-MS is a good (and cheap) one and will take a >>> credit card. >> >> Well, we heat with wood, so... Most things go pretty easily. But I >> called my CC company and chewed them out BIG TIME for sending me >> those stupid checks. I think I had to call 3 times (over a 9 month >> period) before they finally stopped. But they did stop. Of course, >> my CC info has since been stolen, but that's because of crappy online >> retailers and has nothing to do with my mail (IMO). > > Oops....I think I breezed thru the original post too fast....are you saying > that those "transfer checks" I sometimes get from my CC company can steal my > account info even though I tear them into 2-4 pieces? All a thief needs to do is forge that check and the advance goes on your credit card. That and (If I remember correctly) your card number is on the check. I've requested the card companies not send me those checks. Got to the point with one of them I had told three times (and three times ignored) that I finally canceled my account. -- DougW From nobody at spamcop.net Fri Jun 2 11:35:47 2006 From: nobody at spamcop.net (indigo) Date: Fri Jun 2 10:40:03 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Social] Re: revenge is sweet References: Message-ID: DougW wrote: > All a thief needs to do is forge that check and the advance goes on > your credit card. That and (If I remember correctly) your card > number is on the check. They're dumb enough to put card numbers on those stupid checks?! I think mine have account numbers, something like the number at the bottom of a regular check (routing number?). From nobody at spamcop.net Fri Jun 2 12:21:18 2006 From: nobody at spamcop.net (indigo) Date: Fri Jun 2 11:25:04 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Social] How the shrub stole the election Message-ID: http://www.rollingstone.com/news/story/10432334/was_the_2004_election_stolen But despite the media blackout, indications continued to emerge that something deeply troubling had taken place in 2004. Nearly half of the 6 million American voters living abroad(3) never received their ballots -- or received them too late to vote(4) -- after the Pentagon unaccountably shut down a state-of-the-art Web site used to file overseas registrations.(5) A consulting firm called Sproul & Associates, which was hired by the Republican National Committee to register voters in six battleground states,(6) was discovered shredding Democratic registrations.(7) In New Mexico, which was decided by 5,988 votes,(8) malfunctioning machines mysteriously failed to properly register a presidential vote on more than 20,000 ballots.(9) Nationwide, according to the federal commission charged with implementing election reforms, as many as 1 million ballots were spoiled by faulty voting equipment -- roughly one for every 100 cast.(10) The reports were especially disturbing in Ohio, the critical battleground state that clinched Bush's victory in the electoral college. Officials there purged tens of thousands of eligible voters from the rolls, neglected to process registration cards generated by Democratic voter drives, shortchanged Democratic precincts when they allocated voting machines and illegally derailed a recount that could have given Kerry the presidency. ****A precinct in an evangelical church in Miami County recorded an impossibly high turnout of ninety-eight percent***(sounds like one of Saddams elections, eh?****, while a polling place in inner-city Cleveland recorded an equally impossible turnout of only seven percent****. In Warren County, GOP election officials even invented a nonexistent terrorist threat to bar the media from monitoring the official vote count.(11) Any election, of course, will have anomalies. America's voting system is a messy patchwork of polling rules run mostly by county and city officials. ''We didn't have one election for president in 2004,'' says Robert Pastor, who directs the Center for Democracy and Election Management at American University. ''We didn't have fifty elections. We actually had 13,000 elections run by 13,000 independent, quasi-sovereign counties and municipalities.'' But what is most anomalous about the irregularities in 2004 was their decidedly partisan bent: Almost without exception they hurt John Kerry and benefited George Bush. After carefully examining the evidence, I've become convinced that the president's party mounted a massive, coordinated campaign to subvert the will of the people in 2004. Across the country, Republican election officials and party stalwarts employed a wide range of illegal and unethical tactics to fix the election. A review of the available data reveals that in Ohio alone, at least 357,000 voters, the overwhelming majority of them Democratic, were prevented from casting ballots or did not have their votes counted in 2004(12) -- more than enough to shift the results of an election decided by 118,601 votes.(13) (See Ohio's Missing Votes) In what may be the single most astounding fact from the election, one in every four Ohio citizens who registered to vote in 2004 showed up at the polls only to discover that they were not listed on the rolls, thanks to GOP efforts to stem the unprecedented flood of Democrats eager to cast ballots.(14) And that doesn?t even take into account the troubling evidence of outright fraud, which indicates that upwards of 80,000 votes for Kerry were counted instead for Bush. That alone is a swing of more than 160,000 votes -- enough to have put John Kerry in the White House.(15) ''It was terrible,'' says Sen. Christopher Dodd, who helped craft reforms in 2002 that were supposed to prevent such electoral abuses. ''People waiting in line for twelve hours to cast their ballots, people not being allowed to vote because they were in the wrong precinct -- it was an outrage. In Ohio, you had a secretary of state who was determined to guarantee a Republican outcome. I'm terribly disheartened.'' Indeed, the extent of the GOP's effort to rig the vote shocked even the most experienced observers of American elections. ''Ohio was as dirty an election as America has ever seen,'' Lou Harris, the father of modern political polling, told me. ''You look at the turnout and votes in individual precincts, compared to the historic patterns in those counties, and you can tell where the discrepancies are. They stand out like a sore thumb.'' From post.please.this.email.is.not.valid at example.com Fri Jun 2 11:37:56 2006 From: post.please.this.email.is.not.valid at example.com (DougW) Date: Fri Jun 2 11:40:02 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Social] Re: Camel's noses and slippery slopes... References: Message-ID: David Dean did pass the time by typing: > > (logon: helmsthingy/photonic) > > > The Justice Department is asking Internet companies to keep records on > the Web-surfing activities of their customers to aid law enforcement, > and may propose legislation to force them to do so. > Heh.. in that case it's time to write an application that does nothing but surf random sites all day long. :) > > It also wants the Internet companies to retain records about whom their > users exchange e-mail with, but not the contents of e-mail messages, the > executives said. The executives spoke on the condition that they not be > identified because they did not want to offend the Justice Department. > Oh sure.. like terrorists don't know how to use frog or other anonymous email relay systems. -- DougW From nobody at devnull.spamcop.net Fri Jun 2 13:25:28 2006 From: nobody at devnull.spamcop.net (Eponym) Date: Fri Jun 2 12:30:03 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Social] Re: Camel's noses and slippery slopes... References: Message-ID: "DougW" wrote in message news:e5pm0d$f8d$1@news.spamcop.net... > > Oh sure.. like terrorists don't know how to use frog or other anonymous > email relay systems. > Can you say off-shore? I bet this would accelerate IT companies moving to India and wherever to avoid the regulatory hassles/costs. From nobody at spamcop.net Fri Jun 2 13:41:48 2006 From: nobody at spamcop.net (indigo) Date: Fri Jun 2 12:45:03 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Social] Re: revenge is sweet References: Message-ID: Sylvesterthekat wrote: > Charles <8hmte5s02@sneakemail.com> wrote in > news:Xns97D5CD5C41556TheShrubIsAnAss@216.154.195.61: > > > > Not so far. Mind you, I haven't checked my credit rating since this > > little incident. Ha! I must be hopelessly optimistic! You didn't > > expect that of me, did you??? > > > > you might want to get on that, just to be sure since you don't know > with 100% certainty how they got the number I'd like to know how $360.03 disappeared from my debit/checking account! Checked online for activity, nothing weird jumped out at me, and the damn checkbook was balanced just one month ago.....I hate when this happens.... From nobody at spamcop.net Fri Jun 2 13:43:12 2006 From: nobody at spamcop.net (indigo) Date: Fri Jun 2 12:45:04 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Social] Re: revenge is sweet References: Message-ID: Sylvesterthekat wrote: > "indigo" wrote in > news:e5pdlc$9km$1@news.spamcop.net: > > > > Oops....I think I breezed thru the original post too fast....are you > > saying that those "transfer checks" I sometimes get from my CC > > company can steal my account info even though I tear them into 2-4 > > pieces? > > > > > > > > shred em dude. tearing them up makes it harder for some dick to use > them but they have information on there that it's better to be > unreadable So I need to buy another electric device for my already out-of-juice home office? Nuts...... From nobody at spamcop.net Fri Jun 2 13:44:07 2006 From: nobody at spamcop.net (indigo) Date: Fri Jun 2 12:45:05 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Social] Re: Cat rap. References: Message-ID: Sylvesterthekat wrote: > "indigo" wrote in > news:e5htv4$saf$1@news.spamcop.net: > > > >> 030366 (10 quatloos to whomever finds that reference) > > > > Anyone listed that great album yet, 90125? 10 quatloos for the band > > and 20 bonus quatloos for knowing why the album has that title > > (anyone who googles it forfeits all rights to the moolah). > > > > > > > > how will you know if the answer was obtained by Googling? Honesty and integrity? LOL....yeah, right.....still, no one has been able to answer the quiz, I'm shocked Mr. Mean doesn't know the answer at least. From nobody at spamcop.net Fri Jun 2 14:06:03 2006 From: nobody at spamcop.net (indigo) Date: Fri Jun 2 13:10:03 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Social] Re: And then... References: Message-ID: Sylvesterthekat wrote: > > What did you do to your neck, not the old injury again? I played golf for 3 straight days on vacation a few weeks ago, I think I irritated some scar tissue that formed in my neck while I was sitting on my arse all spring sick from Lyme disease and swollen knees. Since I stopped taking the tylenol my gut is not bothering me anymore. Hopefully starting PT again next week, the muscles in my mid/upper back and neck are all in spasm again :-( From kenbrody at spamcop.net Fri Jun 2 13:50:39 2006 From: kenbrody at spamcop.net (Kenneth Brody) Date: Fri Jun 2 13:15:09 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Social] Re: revenge is sweet References: Message-ID: <44806C5F.2A8B02B1@spamcop.net> Sylvesterthekat wrote: > > Charles <8hmte5s02@sneakemail.com> wrote in > news:Xns97D5C79FBC5FCTheShrubIsAnAss@216.154.195.61: > > > > Well, we heat with wood, so... Most things go pretty easily. But I > > called my CC company and chewed them out BIG TIME for sending me those > > stupid checks. I think I had to call 3 times (over a 9 month period) > > before they finally stopped. But they did stop. Of course, my CC > > info has since been stolen, but that's because of crappy online > > retailers and has nothing to do with my mail (IMO). > > > > It is rather stupid. What sort of nutcase would use them anyway?! > Fortunately we don't get very many, maybe one or two a year. [...] Well, we get two types of those checks. One type is the "0% interest for X months" type, which we use on occasion. Others are the "higher- than-normal 'cash advance' rate, with no grace period" checks. Those go straight to the shredder. (Cross-cut, of course.) -- +-------------------------+--------------------+-----------------------------+ | Kenneth J. Brody | www.hvcomputer.com | | | kenbrody/at\spamcop.net | www.fptech.com | #include | +-------------------------+--------------------+-----------------------------+ Don't e-mail me at: From nobody at spamcop.net Fri Jun 2 14:29:20 2006 From: nobody at spamcop.net (indigo) Date: Fri Jun 2 13:30:06 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Social] Re: Rolled over References: Message-ID: Charles wrote: > It wasn't me! It was "indigo" ! > > > You're so far out in the boonies you don't get mail delivery? > > That's a shame.... > > What's a shame about it? No Xmas cards? From nobody at spamcop.net Fri Jun 2 14:52:50 2006 From: nobody at spamcop.net (indigo) Date: Fri Jun 2 13:55:03 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Social] Re: Rolled over References: Message-ID: Charles wrote: > It wasn't me! It was "indigo" ! > > Charles wrote: > >> It wasn't me! It was "indigo" ! > >> > >> > You're so far out in the boonies you don't get mail delivery? > >> > That's a shame.... > >> > >> What's a shame about it? > > > > No Xmas cards? > > Dude, like, what? We have PO boxes. And they work great. But you have to waste YOUR gas to get your mail! From nobody at spamcop.net Fri Jun 2 15:02:42 2006 From: nobody at spamcop.net (indigo) Date: Fri Jun 2 14:05:05 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Social] Re: Rolled over References: Message-ID: Charles wrote: > It wasn't me! It was "indigo" ! > > Charles wrote: > > >> Dude, like, what? We have PO boxes. And they work great. > > > > But you have to waste YOUR gas to get your mail! > > Uh. I have to get to work. Except when you take vacations or sprout a sprog...... From nobody at spamcop.net Fri Jun 2 15:15:26 2006 From: nobody at spamcop.net (indigo) Date: Fri Jun 2 14:20:03 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Social] Re: Rolled over References: Message-ID: Charles wrote: > It wasn't me! It was "indigo" ! > > Charles wrote: > > >> Uh. I have to get to work. > > > > Except when you take vacations or sprout a sprog...... > > Yeah. And? You think I'm on vacation all year, or something? Erm, you *were* on a rather long one last year, weren't you? The unplanned kind, I mean.... And how come no one has responded to my attempt to fan the anti-shrub flames around here? Sheesh, I get no credit for the efforts I expend. From chris.a.wright at gmail.com Fri Jun 2 21:15:46 2006 From: chris.a.wright at gmail.com (Chris Wright) Date: Fri Jun 2 15:20:03 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Social] Re: Camel's noses and slippery slopes... In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: DougW wrote: > David Dean did pass the time by typing: >> >> (logon: helmsthingy/photonic) >> >> >> The Justice Department is asking Internet companies to keep records on >> the Web-surfing activities of their customers to aid law enforcement, >> and may propose legislation to force them to do so. >> > > Heh.. in that case it's time to write an application that does nothing > but surf random sites all day long. :) I've already got a manual one of them From nobody at spamcop.net Fri Jun 2 16:42:50 2006 From: nobody at spamcop.net (indigo) Date: Fri Jun 2 15:45:03 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Social] Re: Rolled over References: Message-ID: Charles wrote: > It wasn't me! It was "indigo" ! > > Charles wrote: > > >> Yeah. And? You think I'm on vacation all year, or something? > > > > Erm, you *were* on a rather long one last year, weren't you? The > > unplanned kind, I mean.... > > Uh. Last year? Nope! I have been fully employed since, oh, mmm, > July of 3 or 4. July of 3 it was. Um. Yup. Only partially > employed in 1 and 3, but, hey, that wasn't that bad. I mean, I had a > cool Bobcat and a lot of fun! Gee, it was that long ago? Time flies..... > > > > And how come no one has responded to my attempt to fan the > > anti-shrub flames around here? Sheesh, I get no credit for the > > efforts I expend. > > Um, you're the one who usually responds to Heidi's posts. Huhm? What's she got to do with it? It was MY post! > I suppose I > could nominate David -again- to respond to you, just this once... How magninomous of you.... From nobody at spamcop.net Fri Jun 2 16:44:02 2006 From: nobody at spamcop.net (indigo) Date: Fri Jun 2 15:45:05 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Social] Re: is this for real?! References: Message-ID: Sylvesterthekat wrote: > http://www.promisedland.com/ Uh, and how does the christian part apply? They bless the guns before the games start? From nobody at spamcop.net Fri Jun 2 17:09:57 2006 From: nobody at spamcop.net (indigo) Date: Fri Jun 2 16:10:03 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Social] Re: is this for real?! References: Message-ID: Sylvesterthekat wrote: > > > > LOL, I dunno. It all seems rather insane to me. I guess there'll be no > nudity or swearing while they metaphorically blow each other's heads > off. Nudity? In paintball? I've never been hit by one (never played), but from what I hear you want several layers of *padding*, being nekkid is asking for even more pain! (let alone the chance of having one's sensitive bits shot off, if one has them to lose). From dfmanno at mail.com Fri Jun 2 20:44:31 2006 From: dfmanno at mail.com (D.F. Manno) Date: Fri Jun 2 19:45:03 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Social] Re: Rolled over References: Message-ID: In article , Charles <8hmte5s02@sneakemail.com> wrote: > Uh. Last year? Nope! I have been fully employed since, oh, mmm, July of > 3 or 4. July of 3 it was. Um. Yup. Only partially employed in 1 and 3, > but, hey, that wasn't that bad. Ladies and gentlemen, may I present the 2,000-year-old man... -- D.F. Manno | dfmanno@mail.com The second article of impeachment against Richard Nixon covered, among other things, warrantless wiretapping. From dfmanno at mail.com Fri Jun 2 20:57:52 2006 From: dfmanno at mail.com (D.F. Manno) Date: Fri Jun 2 20:00:03 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Social] The incredible shrinking Moron in Chief Message-ID: -- D.F. Manno | dfmanno@mail.com The second article of impeachment against Richard Nixon covered, among other things, warrantless wiretapping. From nobody at devnull.spamcop.net Fri Jun 2 21:45:35 2006 From: nobody at devnull.spamcop.net (POP) Date: Fri Jun 2 20:50:04 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Social] Re: The incredible shrinking Moron in Chief References: Message-ID: D.F. Manno wrote: > > > > -- > D.F. Manno | dfmanno@mail.com > The second article of impeachment against Richard Nixon > covered, among other things, warrantless wiretapping. Ummm, OK, and? That's sort of old news, isn't it? A landlord I knew in Chgo was convicted of wiretapping, too; should he be mentioned here too? Pop From nobody at spamcop.net Sat Jun 3 17:59:18 2006 From: nobody at spamcop.net (kram) Date: Sat Jun 3 20:00:07 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Social] Re: is this for real?! References: Message-ID: In Xns97D6805F1BC7Dsylvesterthekat@216.154.195.61 Sylvesterthekat opined: || http://www.promisedland.com/ Training for Armageddon? -- kk == Words, like Nature, half reveal And half conceal the Soul within. ~Alfred, Lord Tennyson, "Im memoriam A.H.H.," 1850 From mikeyhsd at sport.rr.com Sun Jun 4 09:12:03 2006 From: mikeyhsd at sport.rr.com (mikeyhsd) Date: Sun Jun 4 09:15:07 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Social] people who hiere spammers Message-ID: why is is that the people who hire spammers cannot be sued for causing the spam. it is apprent that laws agains spam are useless in stopping spammers. why not laws aginst hiring spammers. mikeyhsd@sport.rr.com From nobody at devnull.spamcop.net Sun Jun 4 13:28:39 2006 From: nobody at devnull.spamcop.net (POP) Date: Sun Jun 4 12:30:05 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Social] Re: people who hiere spammers References: Message-ID: mikeyhsd wrote: > why is is that the people who hire spammers cannot be sued > for causing the spam. > it is apprent that laws agains spam are useless in stopping > spammers. why not laws aginst hiring spammers. > > mikeyhsd@sport.rr.com Because spamming is not necessarily illegal and not illegal at all in a lot of places. From me at privacy.net Sun Jun 4 17:14:04 2006 From: me at privacy.net (NotMe) Date: Sun Jun 4 16:40:03 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Social] Re: revenge is sweet References: <3v73825346ulc5qapabd6m1viieoqtt9id@4ax.com> Message-ID: "Kenneth Loafman" \ | One of my primary side interests is privacy and security. | | Besides, being paranoid with The Shrub in charge is not abnormal. the real question: are we paranoid enough? From porpoise1954 at yahoo.co.uk Mon Jun 5 00:17:23 2006 From: porpoise1954 at yahoo.co.uk (Porpoise) Date: Sun Jun 4 18:20:05 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Social] Re: revenge is sweet References: Message-ID: "indigo" wrote in message news:e5pic4$d6a$1@news.spamcop.net... > > > DougW wrote: >> All a thief needs to do is forge that check and the advance goes on >> your credit card. That and (If I remember correctly) your card >> number is on the check. > > They're dumb enough to put card numbers on those stupid checks?! I think > mine have account numbers, something like the number at the bottom of a > regular check (routing number?). They have numbers (that the CC company can tie the cheque back to you, but the CC number isn't on them. It would, however, be on the accompanying letter that they come with so, if the whole package was lifted, the perp would have that info too. If, on the other hand, they just got hold of a cheque on it's own, there would be no way for them to get your CC number from it. From mikeyhsd at sport.rr.com Sun Jun 4 18:30:31 2006 From: mikeyhsd at sport.rr.com (mikeyhsd) Date: Sun Jun 4 18:35:03 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Social] Re: people who hiere spammers References: Message-ID: exactly. why not have the laws changed/modified to include those who hire spammers. mikeyhsd@sport.rr.com "POP" wrote in message news:e5v1ng$n9e$1@news.spamcop.net... > mikeyhsd wrote: >> why is is that the people who hire spammers cannot be sued >> for causing the spam. >> it is apprent that laws agains spam are useless in stopping >> spammers. why not laws aginst hiring spammers. >> >> mikeyhsd@sport.rr.com > > Because spamming is not necessarily illegal and not illegal at all in a > lot of places. > > From porpoise1954 at yahoo.co.uk Mon Jun 5 09:30:58 2006 From: porpoise1954 at yahoo.co.uk (Porpoise) Date: Mon Jun 5 04:45:19 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Social] America's leading climate scientists claim that they have been censored and gagged by the administration Message-ID: Why doesn't it surprise me? http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/panorama/5005994.stm From nobody at spamcop.net Mon Jun 5 09:38:04 2006 From: nobody at spamcop.net (indigo) Date: Mon Jun 5 08:40:04 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Social] Re: Rolled over References: Message-ID: Charles wrote: > >> Um, you're the one who usually responds to Heidi's posts. > > > > Huhm? What's she got to do with it? It was MY post! > > So? She posts 'em and you reply. I mean, that's the way it's > supposed to work. But the system is all borked... > Because the main instigator is MIA....just trying to pick up her slack! From nobody at spamcop.net Mon Jun 5 09:41:46 2006 From: nobody at spamcop.net (indigo) Date: Mon Jun 5 08:45:03 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Social] Re: America's leading climate scientists claim that they have been censored and gagged by the administration References: Message-ID: Porpoise wrote: > Why doesn't it surprise me? > > http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/panorama/5005994.stm Old news.....one of NASA's head climatologists was threatened with firing if he didn't quit speaking in public about his global warming findings, a warning since recinded once the head cheese of NASA found out about it (admin lackeys were pressuring NASA PR reps to shut up the scientists). From nobody at spamcop.net Mon Jun 5 09:43:05 2006 From: nobody at spamcop.net (indigo) Date: Mon Jun 5 08:45:04 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Social] Re: How the shrub stole the election References: <9e88821uqdhvfk7oj1ri89viu26i31js60@4ax.com> Message-ID: Kenneth Loafman wrote: > On Fri, 2 Jun 2006 11:21:18 -0400, "indigo" > wrote: > > >http://www.rollingstone.com/news/story/10432334/was_the_2004_election_stole n > > > > > >But despite the media blackout, indications continued to emerge that > >something deeply troubling had taken place in 2004. ... > > Take a look at: http://www.evoting-experts.com/ I know about that....the Rep Gov is/has been trying to squash any attempts to provide a paper copy with the electronic voting machines. Now you know why! From nobody at spamcop.net Mon Jun 5 09:44:39 2006 From: nobody at spamcop.net (indigo) Date: Mon Jun 5 08:45:05 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Social] Soprano's question Message-ID: Anyone know the name of the Stones song that they opened and closed the show with? New album or old song? Very, very good, whichever! And what's the deal with skipping how many months at a time like they did last night? Sheesh! Went from summer to Christmas in one frigging hour?!? From nobody at devnull.spamcop.net Mon Jun 5 10:18:33 2006 From: nobody at devnull.spamcop.net (Eponym) Date: Mon Jun 5 09:20:03 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Social] Re: Soprano's question References: Message-ID: "indigo" wrote in message news:e618vn$ke1$1@news.spamcop.net... > Anyone know the name of the Stones song that they opened and closed the > show > with? New album or old song? Very, very good, whichever! > > And what's the deal with skipping how many months at a time like they did > last night? Sheesh! Went from summer to Christmas in one frigging hour?!? > Not sure about the song, but I must of missed the summer to winter thing. AJ was complaining about having to work outside in the cold in the episode before last, so, it didn't seem like a lot of time lapsed to me. And all of the scenes outside suggested it was cold. From nobody at spamcop.net Mon Jun 5 10:38:46 2006 From: nobody at spamcop.net (indigo) Date: Mon Jun 5 09:40:02 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Social] Re: Soprano's question References: Message-ID: Eponym wrote: > "indigo" wrote in message > news:e618vn$ke1$1@news.spamcop.net... > > Anyone know the name of the Stones song that they opened and closed > > the show > > with? New album or old song? Very, very good, whichever! > > > > And what's the deal with skipping how many months at a time like > > they did last night? Sheesh! Went from summer to Christmas in one > > frigging hour?!? > > > > Not sure about the song, but I must of missed the summer to winter > thing. AJ was complaining about having to work outside in the cold in > the episode before last, so, it didn't seem like a lot of time lapsed > to me. And all of the scenes outside suggested it was cold. Ok maybe it wasn't summer in the last episode....but still, they swept from prior to turkey day right to Xmas in like 15 minutes! Nice to see lots of Julianne M. last night, always liked her from her ER days. Radio boys this morning are speculating on who's the new FBI plant, her or the PR gal AJ just started dating........anyone know how long we have to wait for the final 8 episodes? I think last night was the last one for a while. From nobody at spamcop.net Mon Jun 5 11:27:16 2006 From: nobody at spamcop.net (indigo) Date: Mon Jun 5 10:30:04 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Social] Re: Rolled over References: Message-ID: Charles wrote: > It wasn't me! It was "indigo" ! > > > Because the main instigator is MIA... > > And there you have it. Crazy to think that the rest of us have > nothing to say! "the larch" From nobody at spamcop.net Mon Jun 5 12:02:59 2006 From: nobody at spamcop.net (indigo) Date: Mon Jun 5 11:05:02 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Social] Re: How the shrub stole the election References: <9e88821uqdhvfk7oj1ri89viu26i31js60@4ax.com> Message-ID: Kenneth Loafman wrote: > You're supposed to be able to ask for a paper ballot if you don't > want to use the machine. Don't think I've ever seen it done. Can't do that in MD, at least not on election day. Kind of defeats the purpose of using electronic terminals, money-savings-wise, eh? From nobody at spamcop.net Mon Jun 5 12:03:45 2006 From: nobody at spamcop.net (indigo) Date: Mon Jun 5 11:05:04 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Social] was whatever thread.... Message-ID: Charles wrote: > It wasn't me! It was "indigo" ! > > Charles wrote: > >> It wasn't me! It was "indigo" ! > >> > >> > Because the main instigator is MIA... > >> > >> And there you have it. Crazy to think that the rest of us have > >> nothing to say! > > > > "the larch" > > A tree? As in up a tree? Without a ladder? Maybe in a tractor? Without a paddle too! From kenbrody at spamcop.net Mon Jun 5 12:19:29 2006 From: kenbrody at spamcop.net (Kenneth Brody) Date: Mon Jun 5 11:40:03 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Social] Re: Rolled over References: Message-ID: <44844B81.D8C85374@spamcop.net> indigo wrote: > > Charles wrote: > > It wasn't me! It was "indigo" ! > > > Charles wrote: > > >> It wasn't me! It was "indigo" ! > > >> > > >> > You're so far out in the boonies you don't get mail delivery? > > >> > That's a shame.... I'm hardly "in the boonies", but we don't have mail delivery, either. You have to go to the post office to pick up your mail. > > >> What's a shame about it? > > > > > > No Xmas cards? > > > > Dude, like, what? We have PO boxes. And they work great. > > But you have to waste YOUR gas to get your mail! It's called "walking." -- +-------------------------+--------------------+-----------------------------+ | Kenneth J. Brody | www.hvcomputer.com | | | kenbrody/at\spamcop.net | www.fptech.com | #include | +-------------------------+--------------------+-----------------------------+ Don't e-mail me at: From kenbrody at spamcop.net Mon Jun 5 12:22:11 2006 From: kenbrody at spamcop.net (Kenneth Brody) Date: Mon Jun 5 11:40:05 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Social] Re: revenge is sweet References: Message-ID: <44844C23.CEF397A6@spamcop.net> Porpoise wrote: > > "indigo" wrote in message > news:e5pic4$d6a$1@news.spamcop.net... [...] > > They're dumb enough to put card numbers on those stupid checks?! I think > > mine have account numbers, something like the number at the bottom of a > > regular check (routing number?). > > They have numbers (that the CC company can tie the cheque back to you, but > the CC number isn't on them. > > It would, however, be on the accompanying letter that they come with so, if > the whole package was lifted, the perp would have that info too. If, on the > other hand, they just got hold of a cheque on it's own, there would be no > way for them to get your CC number from it. The letters I get usually say "your account ending in XXXX", and don't include the full account number. -- +-------------------------+--------------------+-----------------------------+ | Kenneth J. Brody | www.hvcomputer.com | | | kenbrody/at\spamcop.net | www.fptech.com | #include | +-------------------------+--------------------+-----------------------------+ Don't e-mail me at: From johnl at in.newsgroup.only Mon Jun 5 16:59:23 2006 From: johnl at in.newsgroup.only (JohnL) Date: Mon Jun 5 12:00:03 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Social] Re: was whatever thread.... References: Message-ID: Charles <8hmte5s02@sneakemail.com> wrote in news:Xns97D978D0C1FF0TheShrubIsAnAss@216.154.195.61: > It wasn't me! It was "indigo" ! >> Charles wrote: > >>> As in up a tree? Without a ladder? >> >> Without a paddle too! > > So how do I prevent the heathens from climbing the tree after me? > Easy... 1. Cut a branch 2. carve it into a paddle. There you are, up a tree WITH a paddle! From nobody at spamcop.net Mon Jun 5 12:59:54 2006 From: nobody at spamcop.net (indigo) Date: Mon Jun 5 12:00:04 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Social] Re: was whatever thread.... References: Message-ID: Charles wrote: > It wasn't me! It was "indigo" ! > > Charles wrote: > > >> As in up a tree? Without a ladder? > > > > Without a paddle too! > > So how do I prevent the heathens from climbing the tree after me? Shotgun, of course! From nobody at spamcop.net Mon Jun 5 13:01:11 2006 From: nobody at spamcop.net (indigo) Date: Mon Jun 5 12:05:04 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Social] Re: revenge is sweet References: <44844C23.CEF397A6@spamcop.net> Message-ID: Kenneth Brody wrote: > > The letters I get usually say "your account ending in XXXX", and don't > include the full account number. > > | Kenneth J. Brody | www.hvcomputer.com | > | | kenbrody/at\spamcop.net | www.fptech.com | #include > | | > +-------------------------+--------------------+---------------------------- -+ > Don't e-mail me at: that's what I get too (sig line not snipped on purpose to again nag KB to please fix it properly) From nstehle at wi.rr.com Mon Jun 5 12:31:29 2006 From: nstehle at wi.rr.com (Nathan Stehle) Date: Mon Jun 5 12:35:04 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Social] Re: Soprano's question References: Message-ID: in article e618vn$ke1$1@news.spamcop.net, indigo at nobody@spamcop.net wrote on 6/5/06 7:44 AM: > Anyone know the name of the Stones song that they opened and closed the show > with? New album or old song? Very, very good, whichever! > > And what's the deal with skipping how many months at a time like they did > last night? Sheesh! Went from summer to Christmas in one frigging hour?!? > > The soundtrack can be found at hbo.com. It's not always complete, but it's usually mostly there. Also check out imdb.com. They did not progress that fast. While unclear, it was definitely late fall a few weeks ago. They are not that clear usually on timeframes for events on the show. From nobody at spamcop.net Mon Jun 5 13:43:39 2006 From: nobody at spamcop.net (indigo) Date: Mon Jun 5 12:45:04 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Social] Re: was whatever thread.... References: Message-ID: Charles wrote: > It wasn't me! It was "indigo" ! > > Charles wrote: > > >> So how do I prevent the heathens from climbing the tree after me? > > > > Shotgun, of course! > > Hmm. With a 6 1/2" barrel, say? Sounds more like a pistol to me? I know, you need a short-barreled assault weapon! Say an MP-5? From nobody at spamcop.net Mon Jun 5 13:50:51 2006 From: nobody at spamcop.net (indigo) Date: Mon Jun 5 12:55:03 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Social] Re: Soprano's question References: Message-ID: Nathan Stehle wrote: > in article e618vn$ke1$1@news.spamcop.net, indigo at > nobody@spamcop.net wrote on 6/5/06 7:44 AM: > > > Anyone know the name of the Stones song that they opened and closed > > the show with? New album or old song? Very, very good, whichever! > > > > And what's the deal with skipping how many months at a time like > > they did last night? Sheesh! Went from summer to Christmas in one > > frigging hour?!? > > > > > > The soundtrack can be found at hbo.com. It's not always complete, > but it's usually mostly there. Also check out imdb.com. Ah, thank you! "Moonlight Mile" from Sticky Fingers. Just may have to buy that CD now, looks like a great album altogether. From nobody at spamcop.net Mon Jun 5 14:02:28 2006 From: nobody at spamcop.net (indigo) Date: Mon Jun 5 13:05:02 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Social] Re: Soprano's question References: Message-ID: indigo wrote: > Ah, thank you! "Moonlight Mile" from Sticky Fingers. Just may have to > buy that CD now, looks like a great album altogether. Just did. Ain't the internet a wunnerful thing? ;-) From porpoise1954 at yahoo.co.uk Mon Jun 5 19:06:11 2006 From: porpoise1954 at yahoo.co.uk (Porpoise) Date: Mon Jun 5 13:10:02 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Social] Re: revenge is sweet References: <44844C23.CEF397A6@spamcop.net> Message-ID: "indigo" wrote in message news:e61kg7$rg1$1@news.spamcop.net... > > > Kenneth Brody wrote: >> >> The letters I get usually say "your account ending in XXXX", and don't >> include the full account number. >> >> | Kenneth J. Brody | www.hvcomputer.com | >> | | kenbrody/at\spamcop.net | www.fptech.com | #include >> | | >> > +-------------------------+--------------------+---------------------------- > -+ >> Don't e-mail me at: > > that's what I get too (sig line not snipped on purpose to again nag KB to > please fix it properly) > NAG! NAG! NAG! NAG! ;-) That would be a "Good Thing" [TM] I don't know why people feel the need for sigs in here anyway - we can see who the poster is from the headers...... From Nospam at nothanks.com Mon Jun 5 15:38:18 2006 From: Nospam at nothanks.com (Grog in Ohio) Date: Mon Jun 5 14:40:02 2006 Subject: [SpamCop-Social] Re: Soprano's question References: Message-ID: "indigo" wrote in message news:e61c56$mbq$1@news.spamcop.net... > > > just started dating........anyone know how long we have to wait for the > final 8 episodes? I think last night was the last one for a while. > I believe it's January 2007... For a measley 8 episodes before it's done. Grog